TSTP Solution File: GEO257+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : GEO257+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 11:15:03 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   70 (  19   ~;   1   |;  43   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   8 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (  21   !;  15   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f157,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f136,f111]) ).

fof(f111,plain,
    left_apart_point(sK5,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f103]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ( ~ before_on_line(sK1,sK2,sK4)
    & before_on_line(sK1,sK3,sK4)
    & before_on_line(sK1,sK2,sK3)
    & left_apart_point(sK5,sK1)
    & ~ apart_point_and_line(sK4,sK1)
    & distinct_points(sK3,sK4)
    & distinct_points(sK2,sK4) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5])],[f62,f102]) ).

fof(f102,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( ~ before_on_line(X0,X1,X3)
        & before_on_line(X0,X2,X3)
        & before_on_line(X0,X1,X2)
        & left_apart_point(X4,X0)
        & ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,X0)
        & distinct_points(X2,X3)
        & distinct_points(X1,X3) )
   => ( ~ before_on_line(sK1,sK2,sK4)
      & before_on_line(sK1,sK3,sK4)
      & before_on_line(sK1,sK2,sK3)
      & left_apart_point(sK5,sK1)
      & ~ apart_point_and_line(sK4,sK1)
      & distinct_points(sK3,sK4)
      & distinct_points(sK2,sK4) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ before_on_line(X0,X1,X3)
      & before_on_line(X0,X2,X3)
      & before_on_line(X0,X1,X2)
      & left_apart_point(X4,X0)
      & ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,X0)
      & distinct_points(X2,X3)
      & distinct_points(X1,X3) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ before_on_line(X0,X1,X3)
      & before_on_line(X0,X2,X3)
      & before_on_line(X0,X1,X2)
      & left_apart_point(X4,X0)
      & ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,X0)
      & distinct_points(X2,X3)
      & distinct_points(X1,X3) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( ( left_apart_point(X4,X0)
          & ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,X0)
          & distinct_points(X2,X3)
          & distinct_points(X1,X3) )
       => ( ( before_on_line(X0,X2,X3)
            & before_on_line(X0,X1,X2) )
         => before_on_line(X0,X1,X3) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X0,X3,X4,X6] :
        ( ( left_apart_point(X6,X1)
          & ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,X1)
          & distinct_points(X3,X4)
          & distinct_points(X0,X4) )
       => ( ( before_on_line(X1,X3,X4)
            & before_on_line(X1,X0,X3) )
         => before_on_line(X1,X0,X4) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f32,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X0,X3,X4,X6] :
      ( ( left_apart_point(X6,X1)
        & ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,X1)
        & distinct_points(X3,X4)
        & distinct_points(X0,X4) )
     => ( ( before_on_line(X1,X3,X4)
          & before_on_line(X1,X0,X3) )
       => before_on_line(X1,X0,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f79]) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1))
      & ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1))
        | left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',oag10) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem    : GEO257+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 05:37:56 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.35  % (363)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.37  % (368)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (368)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.37  % (365)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (364)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (368)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.37  % (368)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.37  % (368)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.21/0.37  % (368)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  % (368)Memory used [KB]: 848
% 0.21/0.37  % (368)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.37  % (368)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.21/0.37  % (368)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.37  % (368)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.37  % (363)Success in time 0.017 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------