TSTP Solution File: GEO257+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : GEO257+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n007.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 16091.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Apr 1 13:39:18 EDT 2016
% Result : Theorem 0.07s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 56 ( 17 ~; 1 |; 32 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 2 sgn 21 !; 10 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(10,axiom,
! [X1,X3] :
~ ( left_apart_point(X1,X3)
| left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpHqkXFu/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',oag10) ).
fof(12,conjecture,
! [X3,X1,X2,X6,X7] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X6)
& distinct_points(X2,X6)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,X3)
& left_apart_point(X7,X3) )
=> ( ( before_on_line(X3,X1,X2)
& before_on_line(X3,X2,X6) )
=> before_on_line(X3,X1,X6) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpHqkXFu/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',con) ).
fof(13,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X3,X1,X2,X6,X7] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X6)
& distinct_points(X2,X6)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,X3)
& left_apart_point(X7,X3) )
=> ( ( before_on_line(X3,X1,X2)
& before_on_line(X3,X2,X6) )
=> before_on_line(X3,X1,X6) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[12]) ).
fof(19,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X3,X1,X2,X6,X7] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X6)
& distinct_points(X2,X6)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,X3)
& left_apart_point(X7,X3) )
=> ( ( before_on_line(X3,X1,X2)
& before_on_line(X3,X2,X6) )
=> before_on_line(X3,X1,X6) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[13,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(60,plain,
! [X1,X3] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X1,X3)
& ~ left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X3)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
fof(61,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X4,X5)
& ~ left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X5)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[60]) ).
cnf(63,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[61]) ).
fof(67,negated_conjecture,
? [X3,X1,X2,X6,X7] :
( distinct_points(X1,X6)
& distinct_points(X2,X6)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,X3)
& left_apart_point(X7,X3)
& before_on_line(X3,X1,X2)
& before_on_line(X3,X2,X6)
& ~ before_on_line(X3,X1,X6) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
fof(68,negated_conjecture,
? [X8,X9,X10,X11,X12] :
( distinct_points(X9,X11)
& distinct_points(X10,X11)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X11,X8)
& left_apart_point(X12,X8)
& before_on_line(X8,X9,X10)
& before_on_line(X8,X10,X11)
& ~ before_on_line(X8,X9,X11) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[67]) ).
fof(69,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk2_0,esk4_0)
& distinct_points(esk3_0,esk4_0)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(esk4_0,esk1_0)
& left_apart_point(esk5_0,esk1_0)
& before_on_line(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
& before_on_line(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk4_0)
& ~ before_on_line(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[68]) ).
cnf(73,negated_conjecture,
left_apart_point(esk5_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[69]) ).
cnf(77,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[73,63,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(78,negated_conjecture,
$false,
77,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GEO257+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.02/0.04 % Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n007.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 16091.75MB
% 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Fri Apr 1 11:26:22 CDT 2016
% 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime :
% 0.03/0.27 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.27 --creating new selector for [GEO007+0.ax]
% 0.07/0.33 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpHqkXFu/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.07/0.33 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpHqkXFu/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.07/0.33 -prover status Theorem
% 0.07/0.33 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.07/0.33 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.33 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.33 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.07/0.33 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.07/0.33 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.07/0.33 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.33 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------