TSTP Solution File: GEO252+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : GEO252+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n003.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 16091.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Apr 1 13:39:17 EDT 2016
% Result : Theorem 0.06s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 30 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 13 ~; 4 |; 12 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 2 sgn 12 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(11,axiom,
! [X1,X3] :
~ ( left_apart_point(X1,X3)
| left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp49fkhT/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',oag10) ).
fof(13,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( left_apart_point(X1,X3)
& left_apart_point(X2,reverse_line(X3)) )
=> ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& left_convergent_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp49fkhT/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',con) ).
fof(14,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( left_apart_point(X1,X3)
& left_apart_point(X2,reverse_line(X3)) )
=> ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& left_convergent_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),X3) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[13]) ).
fof(50,plain,
! [X1,X3] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X1,X3)
& ~ left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X3)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
fof(51,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X4,X5)
& ~ left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X5)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[50]) ).
cnf(53,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[51]) ).
fof(57,negated_conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X3] :
( left_apart_point(X1,X3)
& left_apart_point(X2,reverse_line(X3))
& ( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ left_convergent_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),X3) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
fof(58,negated_conjecture,
? [X4,X5,X6] :
( left_apart_point(X4,X6)
& left_apart_point(X5,reverse_line(X6))
& ( ~ distinct_points(X4,X5)
| ~ left_convergent_lines(line_connecting(X4,X5),X6) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[57]) ).
fof(59,negated_conjecture,
( left_apart_point(esk1_0,esk3_0)
& left_apart_point(esk2_0,reverse_line(esk3_0))
& ( ~ distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| ~ left_convergent_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[58]) ).
cnf(62,negated_conjecture,
left_apart_point(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[59]) ).
cnf(63,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[62,53,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(64,negated_conjecture,
$false,
63,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GEO252+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.22 % Computer : n003.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.22 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.22 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.22 % Memory : 16091.75MB
% 0.03/0.22 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.22 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.22 % DateTime : Fri Apr 1 11:21:53 CDT 2016
% 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime :
% 0.03/0.27 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.27 --creating new selector for [GEO007+0.ax]
% 0.06/0.34 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp49fkhT/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.06/0.34 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp49fkhT/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.06/0.34 -prover status Theorem
% 0.06/0.34 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.06/0.34 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.34 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.34 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.06/0.34 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.06/0.34 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.06/0.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.06/0.34 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------