TSTP Solution File: GEO252+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : GEO252+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:22:46 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 11.25s 2.44s
% Output   : Proof 15.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : GEO252+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 20:54:16 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.63  ________       _____
% 0.22/0.63  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.22/0.63  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.22/0.63  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.22/0.63  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.22/0.63  (2023-06-19)
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.22/0.63  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.22/0.63                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.22/0.63  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.22/0.65  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 3.20/1.31  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.20/1.31  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.20/1.37  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.20/1.37  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.20/1.37  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 3.20/1.37  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.20/1.37  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 9.38/2.15  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 9.38/2.19  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.38/2.21  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.07/2.25  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.47/2.32  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 11.25/2.44  Prover 6: proved (1745ms)
% 11.25/2.44  
% 11.25/2.44  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.25/2.44  
% 11.25/2.44  Prover 5: proved (1774ms)
% 11.25/2.45  
% 11.25/2.45  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.25/2.45  
% 11.52/2.45  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 11.52/2.45  Prover 3: stopped
% 11.52/2.46  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 11.52/2.46  Prover 2: stopped
% 11.52/2.46  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 11.52/2.49  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 12.04/2.54  Prover 1: Found proof (size 5)
% 12.04/2.54  Prover 1: proved (1881ms)
% 12.04/2.57  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 12.35/2.61  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 12.35/2.61  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 12.35/2.64  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 12.35/2.71  Prover 10: stopped
% 12.35/2.71  Prover 7: stopped
% 13.86/2.88  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.17/2.91  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 14.17/2.91  Prover 4: stopped
% 14.17/2.92  Prover 11: stopped
% 14.17/2.93  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.17/2.95  Prover 8: stopped
% 14.42/2.99  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 14.42/3.01  Prover 0: stopped
% 14.42/3.01  
% 14.42/3.01  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 14.42/3.01  
% 14.42/3.01  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 14.42/3.02  Assumptions after simplification:
% 14.42/3.02  ---------------------------------
% 14.42/3.02  
% 14.42/3.02    (con)
% 14.85/3.07     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5:
% 14.85/3.07      $i] :  ? [v6: any] : (left_convergent_lines(v5, v2) = v6 &
% 14.85/3.07      line_connecting(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4 &
% 14.85/3.07      reverse_line(v2) = v3 & left_apart_point(v1, v3) = 0 & left_apart_point(v0,
% 14.85/3.07        v2) = 0 & $i(v5) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~
% 14.85/3.07        (v4 = 0)))
% 14.85/3.07  
% 14.85/3.07    (oag10)
% 14.85/3.07     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (reverse_line(v1) = v2) |  ~
% 14.85/3.07      (left_apart_point(v0, v2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 14.85/3.07    [v1: $i] : ( ~ (left_apart_point(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 14.85/3.07  
% 14.85/3.07  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 14.85/3.07  --------------------------------------------
% 14.85/3.07  apt_def, bet_def, bf_def, con_def, div_def, oag1, oag11, oag2, oag3, oag4, oag5,
% 14.85/3.07  oag6, oag7, oag8, oag9, oagco1, oagco10, oagco2, oagco3, oagco4, oagco5, oagco6,
% 14.85/3.07  oagco7, oagco8, oagco9, oagsub1, oagsub2, oagsub3, oaguc1, oaguc2
% 14.85/3.07  
% 14.85/3.07  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 14.85/3.07  ---------------------------------
% 14.85/3.07  
% 14.85/3.07  Begin of proof
% 14.85/3.07  | 
% 14.85/3.08  | ALPHA: (oag10) implies:
% 14.85/3.08  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (reverse_line(v1) = v2) |
% 14.85/3.08  |           ~ (left_apart_point(v0, v2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 14.85/3.08  | 
% 14.85/3.08  | DELTA: instantiating (con) with fresh symbols all_34_0, all_34_1, all_34_2,
% 14.85/3.08  |        all_34_3, all_34_4, all_34_5, all_34_6 gives:
% 14.85/3.08  |   (2)  left_convergent_lines(all_34_1, all_34_4) = all_34_0 &
% 14.85/3.08  |        line_connecting(all_34_6, all_34_5) = all_34_1 &
% 14.85/3.08  |        distinct_points(all_34_6, all_34_5) = all_34_2 & reverse_line(all_34_4)
% 14.85/3.08  |        = all_34_3 & left_apart_point(all_34_5, all_34_3) = 0 &
% 14.85/3.09  |        left_apart_point(all_34_6, all_34_4) = 0 & $i(all_34_1) & $i(all_34_3)
% 14.85/3.09  |        & $i(all_34_4) & $i(all_34_5) & $i(all_34_6) & ( ~ (all_34_0 = 0) |  ~
% 14.85/3.09  |          (all_34_2 = 0))
% 14.85/3.09  | 
% 14.85/3.09  | ALPHA: (2) implies:
% 15.08/3.09  |   (3)  $i(all_34_5)
% 15.08/3.09  |   (4)  $i(all_34_4)
% 15.08/3.09  |   (5)  left_apart_point(all_34_5, all_34_3) = 0
% 15.08/3.09  |   (6)  reverse_line(all_34_4) = all_34_3
% 15.08/3.09  | 
% 15.08/3.09  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_34_5, all_34_4, all_34_3, simplifying
% 15.08/3.09  |              with (3), (4), (5), (6) gives:
% 15.08/3.09  |   (7)  $false
% 15.08/3.09  | 
% 15.08/3.09  | CLOSE: (7) is inconsistent.
% 15.08/3.09  | 
% 15.08/3.09  End of proof
% 15.08/3.09  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 15.08/3.09  
% 15.08/3.09  2458ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------