TSTP Solution File: GEO252+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO252+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.33s 2.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 5 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_19,negated_conjecture,
left_apart_point(esk1_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lj3ei7z/input.p',i_0_19) ).
cnf(i_0_30,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lj3ei7z/input.p',i_0_30) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
left_apart_point(esk1_0,esk3_0),
i_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
i_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GEO252+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.13/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 02:24:51 EDT 2022
% 0.19/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.33/2.43 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 7.33/2.43 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.33/2.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 7.33/2.43
% 7.33/2.43 # Proof found!
% 7.33/2.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.33/2.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.33/2.43 # Proof object total steps : 5
% 7.33/2.43 # Proof object clause steps : 3
% 7.33/2.43 # Proof object formula steps : 2
% 7.33/2.43 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 7.33/2.43 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 7.33/2.43 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 7.33/2.43 # Proof object initial clauses used : 2
% 7.33/2.43 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 7.33/2.43 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 7.33/2.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.33/2.43 # Parsed axioms : 61
% 7.33/2.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Initial clauses : 61
% 7.33/2.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 61
% 7.33/2.43 # Processed clauses : 3
% 7.33/2.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 7.33/2.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Generated clauses : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Paramodulations : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 7.33/2.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 7.33/2.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 58
% 7.33/2.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 162
% 7.33/2.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 7.33/2.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.33/2.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1002
% 7.33/2.43
% 7.33/2.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.33/2.43 # User time : 0.014 s
% 7.33/2.43 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.33/2.43 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 7.33/2.43 # ...preprocessing : 0.018 s
% 7.33/2.43 # ...main loop : 0.000 s
% 7.33/2.43 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.33/2.43
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------