TSTP Solution File: GEO251+3 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : GEO251+3 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 09:09:31 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 33 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 16 ~; 6 |; 7 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 4 sgn 18 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(10,axiom,
! [X1,X4] :
~ ( left_apart_point(X1,X4)
| left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X4)) ),
file('/tmp/tmpufTuCg/sel_GEO251+3.p_1',ax10_basics) ).
fof(13,axiom,
! [X7,X8] :
( right_apart_point(X7,X8)
<=> left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(X8)) ),
file('/tmp/tmpufTuCg/sel_GEO251+3.p_1',a2_defns) ).
fof(23,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X4] :
( right_apart_point(X2,parallel_through_point(X4,X1))
=> left_apart_point(X1,parallel_through_point(X4,X2)) ),
file('/tmp/tmpufTuCg/sel_GEO251+3.p_1',con) ).
fof(24,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X4] :
( right_apart_point(X2,parallel_through_point(X4,X1))
=> left_apart_point(X1,parallel_through_point(X4,X2)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[23]) ).
fof(59,plain,
! [X1,X4] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X1,X4)
& ~ left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X4)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
fof(60,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X5,X6)
& ~ left_apart_point(X5,reverse_line(X6)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[59]) ).
cnf(62,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[60]) ).
fof(67,plain,
! [X7,X8] :
( ( ~ right_apart_point(X7,X8)
| left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(X8)) )
& ( ~ left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(X8))
| right_apart_point(X7,X8) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
fof(68,plain,
! [X9,X10] :
( ( ~ right_apart_point(X9,X10)
| left_apart_point(X9,reverse_line(X10)) )
& ( ~ left_apart_point(X9,reverse_line(X10))
| right_apart_point(X9,X10) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[67]) ).
cnf(70,plain,
( left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ right_apart_point(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[68]) ).
fof(103,negated_conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X4] :
( right_apart_point(X2,parallel_through_point(X4,X1))
& ~ left_apart_point(X1,parallel_through_point(X4,X2)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[24]) ).
fof(104,negated_conjecture,
? [X5,X6,X7] :
( right_apart_point(X6,parallel_through_point(X7,X5))
& ~ left_apart_point(X5,parallel_through_point(X7,X6)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[103]) ).
fof(105,negated_conjecture,
( right_apart_point(esk2_0,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))
& ~ left_apart_point(esk1_0,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[104]) ).
cnf(107,negated_conjecture,
right_apart_point(esk2_0,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[105]) ).
cnf(109,plain,
~ right_apart_point(X1,X2),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[70,62,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(110,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[107,109,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(111,negated_conjecture,
$false,
110,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/GEO/GEO251+3.p
% --creating new selector for [GEO009+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpufTuCg/sel_GEO251+3.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem GEO251+3.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/GEO/GEO251+3.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/GEO/GEO251+3.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------