TSTP Solution File: GEO251+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : GEO251+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:12:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 25 ( 13 ~; 1 |; 7 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 17 !; 9 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f154,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f152,f143]) ).
fof(f143,plain,
! [X0,X1] : ~ left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f111]) ).
fof(f111,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X0))
& ~ left_apart_point(X1,X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f93]) ).
fof(f93,plain,
! [X1,X0] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1))
& ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f15,axiom,
! [X1,X0] :
~ ( left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1))
| left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',oag10) ).
fof(f152,plain,
left_apart_point(sK1,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(sK2,sK0))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f116,plain,
( ~ left_apart_point(sK0,parallel_through_point(sK2,sK1))
& left_apart_point(sK1,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(sK2,sK0))) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f114,f115]) ).
fof(f115,plain,
( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X0,parallel_through_point(X2,X1))
& left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X2,X0))) )
=> ( ~ left_apart_point(sK0,parallel_through_point(sK2,sK1))
& left_apart_point(sK1,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(sK2,sK0))) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f114,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X0,parallel_through_point(X2,X1))
& left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X2,X0))) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f74]) ).
fof(f74,plain,
? [X2,X1,X0] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X2,parallel_through_point(X0,X1))
& left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X0,X2))) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).
fof(f37,plain,
~ ! [X1,X0,X2] :
( left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X0,X2)))
=> left_apart_point(X2,parallel_through_point(X0,X1)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f33]) ).
fof(f33,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X3,X0] :
( left_apart_point(X3,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X1,X0)))
=> left_apart_point(X0,parallel_through_point(X1,X3)) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f32]) ).
fof(f32,conjecture,
! [X1,X3,X0] :
( left_apart_point(X3,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X1,X0)))
=> left_apart_point(X0,parallel_through_point(X1,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO251+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 21:32:09 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 % (31202)ott+10_1:32_abs=on:br=off:urr=ec_only:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (31224)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (31202)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.50 % (31225)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (31205)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (31202)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.50 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.50 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 % (31202)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 % (31202)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.50 % (31202)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.50 % (31202)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 % (31202)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.20/0.50 % (31202)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.50 % (31202)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.50 % (31202)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 % (31202)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 % (31198)Success in time 0.159 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------