TSTP Solution File: GEO250+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : GEO250+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 11:15:00 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (  10   ~;   1   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (  15   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f140,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f126,f103]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    left_apart_point(sK2,parallel_through_point(sK3,sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ( ~ left_apart_point(sK1,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(sK3,sK2)))
    & left_apart_point(sK2,parallel_through_point(sK3,sK1)) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f61,f99]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ~ left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X2,X1)))
        & left_apart_point(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X0)) )
   => ( ~ left_apart_point(sK1,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(sK3,sK2)))
      & left_apart_point(sK2,parallel_through_point(sK3,sK1)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X2,X1)))
      & left_apart_point(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( left_apart_point(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X0))
       => left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X2,X1))) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X3,X1] :
        ( left_apart_point(X3,parallel_through_point(X1,X0))
       => left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f32,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X3,X1] :
      ( left_apart_point(X3,parallel_through_point(X1,X0))
     => left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(parallel_through_point(X1,X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1))
      & ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1))
        | left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',oag10) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : GEO250+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 06:03:15 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.35  % (20178)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.37  % (20184)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [1,1]
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [2,1]
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [3,1]
% 0.14/0.37  % (20181)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (20182)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (20185)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (20183)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (20186)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [2,2]
% 0.14/0.37  % (20187)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (20185)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [3,2]
% 0.14/0.37  % (20186)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.37  % (20183)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.37  % (20185)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.37  % (20185)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (20185)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.14/0.37  % (20185)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (20185)Memory used [KB]: 830
% 0.14/0.37  % (20185)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (20185)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (20185)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (20185)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (20178)Success in time 0.019 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------