TSTP Solution File: GEO249+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem : GEO249+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 16 20:36:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.40s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : GEO249+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Aug 31 07:14:11 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.12/0.35 Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.12/0.35 -h, -? prints this message.
% 0.12/0.35 -smt2 print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.12/0.35 -m, -model generate model.
% 0.12/0.35 -p, -proof generate proof.
% 0.12/0.35 -c, -core generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.12/0.35 -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.12/0.35 -t:timeout set timeout (in second).
% 0.12/0.35 -smt2status display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.12/0.35 -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.12/0.35 -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.12/0.35 -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.12/0.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.40 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.12/0.40 tff(left_apart_point_type, type, (
% 0.12/0.40 left_apart_point: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(reverse_line_type, type, (
% 0.12/0.40 reverse_line: $i > $i)).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(tptp_fun_L_0_type, type, (
% 0.12/0.40 tptp_fun_L_0: $i)).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(tptp_fun_A_2_type, type, (
% 0.12/0.40 tptp_fun_A_2: $i)).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(parallel_through_point_type, type, (
% 0.12/0.40 parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i)).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(tptp_fun_B_1_type, type, (
% 0.12/0.40 tptp_fun_B_1: $i)).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(1,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 ((~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)) & left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(parallel_through_point(L, A))))) | left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(L)))) <=> (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)) & left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(parallel_through_point(L, A))))) | left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(2,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 ((~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)) & left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(parallel_through_point(L, A)))) => left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(L)))) <=> (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)) & left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(parallel_through_point(L, A))))) | left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(3,axiom,(~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)) & left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(parallel_through_point(L, A)))) => left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(L)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','con')).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(4,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)) & left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(parallel_through_point(L, A))))) | left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(L)))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[3, 2])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(5,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)) & left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(parallel_through_point(L, A))))) | left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(L)))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[4, 1])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(6,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)) & left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(parallel_through_point(L, A))))) | left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(L)))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[5, 1])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(7,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)) & left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(parallel_through_point(L, A))))) | left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(L)))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[6, 1])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(8,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)) & left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(parallel_through_point(L, A))))) | left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(L)))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7, 1])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(9,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)) & left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(parallel_through_point(L, A))))) | left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(L)))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8, 1])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(10,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)) & left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(parallel_through_point(L, A))))) | left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(L)))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 1])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(11,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40 ~((~(left_apart_point(A!2, reverse_line(L!0)) & left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(parallel_through_point(L!0, A!2))))) | left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(L!0)))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[10])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(12,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 (left_apart_point(A!2, reverse_line(L!0)) & left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(parallel_through_point(L!0, A!2)))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[11])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(13,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 (left_apart_point(A!2, reverse_line(L!0))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(and_elim,[status(thm)],[12])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(14,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 ((left_apart_point(A!2, L!0) | left_apart_point(A!2, reverse_line(L!0))) | (~left_apart_point(A!2, reverse_line(L!0)))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(15,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 (left_apart_point(A!2, L!0) | left_apart_point(A!2, reverse_line(L!0))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[14, 13])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(16,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 (^[A: $i, L: $i] : refl((~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))) <=> (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(17,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))) <=> ![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[16])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(18,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))) <=> ![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(19,axiom,(![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax','oag10')).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(20,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[19, 18])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(21,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40 ![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[20])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(22,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[21, 17])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(23,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 ((~![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))) | (~(left_apart_point(A!2, L!0) | left_apart_point(A!2, reverse_line(L!0))))),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.40 tff(24,plain,
% 0.12/0.40 ($false),
% 0.12/0.40 inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[23, 22, 15])).
% 0.12/0.40 % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------