TSTP Solution File: GEO247+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO247+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:05:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 6 ~; 1 |; 23 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 4 sgn 18 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X3,X6,X7,X9,X4,X5] :
( ( left_apart_point(X3,X4)
& left_apart_point(X3,X5)
& right_apart_point(X6,X4)
& right_apart_point(X6,X5)
& left_apart_point(X7,X4)
& right_apart_point(X7,X5)
& right_apart_point(X9,X4)
& left_apart_point(X9,X5) )
=> convergent_lines(X4,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',con) ).
fof(ax10_basics,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
~ ( left_apart_point(X3,X4)
| left_apart_point(X3,reverse_line(X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO009+0.ax',ax10_basics) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X3,X6,X7,X9,X4,X5] :
( ( left_apart_point(X3,X4)
& left_apart_point(X3,X5)
& right_apart_point(X6,X4)
& right_apart_point(X6,X5)
& left_apart_point(X7,X4)
& right_apart_point(X7,X5)
& right_apart_point(X9,X4)
& left_apart_point(X9,X5) )
=> convergent_lines(X4,X5) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( left_apart_point(esk1_0,esk5_0)
& left_apart_point(esk1_0,esk6_0)
& right_apart_point(esk2_0,esk5_0)
& right_apart_point(esk2_0,esk6_0)
& left_apart_point(esk3_0,esk5_0)
& right_apart_point(esk3_0,esk6_0)
& right_apart_point(esk4_0,esk5_0)
& left_apart_point(esk4_0,esk6_0)
& ~ convergent_lines(esk5_0,esk6_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X5,X6,X5,X6] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X5,X6)
& ~ left_apart_point(X5,reverse_line(X6)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax10_basics])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
left_apart_point(esk1_0,esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : GEO247+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.20/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.20/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 20:22:52 EDT 2022
% 0.20/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.25/1.42
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 8
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 3
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 2
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 0.25/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 37
% 0.25/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 12
% 0.25/1.42 # Initial clauses : 46
% 0.25/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 46
% 0.25/1.42 # Processed clauses : 11
% 0.25/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 11
% 0.25/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.25/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.25/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.25/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.25/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 35
% 0.25/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 85
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.25/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2386
% 0.25/1.42
% 0.25/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.42 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.25/1.42 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.25/1.42 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.25/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2788 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------