TSTP Solution File: GEO247+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : GEO247+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n014.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 16091.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Apr 1 13:39:17 EDT 2016
% Result : Theorem 0.06s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 55 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 53 ( 10 ~; 1 |; 40 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 8 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 2 sgn 18 !; 12 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(7,axiom,
! [X3,X1] :
~ ( left_apart_point(X3,X1)
| left_apart_point(X3,reverse_line(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpb9OCX8/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',oag10) ).
fof(9,conjecture,
! [X3,X4,X6,X7,X1,X2] :
( ( left_apart_point(X3,X1)
& left_apart_point(X3,X2)
& left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X1))
& left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X2))
& left_apart_point(X6,X1)
& left_apart_point(X6,reverse_line(X2))
& left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(X1))
& left_apart_point(X7,X2) )
=> convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpb9OCX8/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',con) ).
fof(10,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X3,X4,X6,X7,X1,X2] :
( ( left_apart_point(X3,X1)
& left_apart_point(X3,X2)
& left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X1))
& left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X2))
& left_apart_point(X6,X1)
& left_apart_point(X6,reverse_line(X2))
& left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(X1))
& left_apart_point(X7,X2) )
=> convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[9]) ).
fof(36,plain,
! [X3,X1] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X3,X1)
& ~ left_apart_point(X3,reverse_line(X1)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
fof(37,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X4,X5)
& ~ left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X5)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[36]) ).
cnf(39,plain,
~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[37]) ).
fof(43,negated_conjecture,
? [X3,X4,X6,X7,X1,X2] :
( left_apart_point(X3,X1)
& left_apart_point(X3,X2)
& left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X1))
& left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X2))
& left_apart_point(X6,X1)
& left_apart_point(X6,reverse_line(X2))
& left_apart_point(X7,reverse_line(X1))
& left_apart_point(X7,X2)
& ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
fof(44,negated_conjecture,
? [X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13] :
( left_apart_point(X8,X12)
& left_apart_point(X8,X13)
& left_apart_point(X9,reverse_line(X12))
& left_apart_point(X9,reverse_line(X13))
& left_apart_point(X10,X12)
& left_apart_point(X10,reverse_line(X13))
& left_apart_point(X11,reverse_line(X12))
& left_apart_point(X11,X13)
& ~ convergent_lines(X12,X13) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[43]) ).
fof(45,negated_conjecture,
( left_apart_point(esk1_0,esk5_0)
& left_apart_point(esk1_0,esk6_0)
& left_apart_point(esk2_0,reverse_line(esk5_0))
& left_apart_point(esk2_0,reverse_line(esk6_0))
& left_apart_point(esk3_0,esk5_0)
& left_apart_point(esk3_0,reverse_line(esk6_0))
& left_apart_point(esk4_0,reverse_line(esk5_0))
& left_apart_point(esk4_0,esk6_0)
& ~ convergent_lines(esk5_0,esk6_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[44]) ).
cnf(54,negated_conjecture,
left_apart_point(esk1_0,esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[45]) ).
cnf(55,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[54,39,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(56,negated_conjecture,
$false,
55,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GEO247+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.02/0.23 % Computer : n014.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.23 % Memory : 16091.75MB
% 0.02/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.23 % DateTime : Fri Apr 1 11:19:23 CDT 2016
% 0.02/0.23 % CPUTime :
% 0.02/0.27 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.27 --creating new selector for [GEO007+0.ax]
% 0.06/0.34 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpb9OCX8/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.06/0.34 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpb9OCX8/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.06/0.34 -prover status Theorem
% 0.06/0.34 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.06/0.34 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.34 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.34 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.06/0.34 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.06/0.34 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.06/0.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.06/0.34 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------