TSTP Solution File: GEO245+3 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : GEO245+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:09:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 36 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 13 ~; 2 |; 13 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 17 !; 12 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f190,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f169,f151]) ).
fof(f151,plain,
! [X0,X1] : ~ left_apart_point(X1,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).
fof(f85,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X1,X0)
& ~ left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X0)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).
fof(f68,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
~ ( left_apart_point(X1,X0)
| left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X0)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f20]) ).
fof(f20,axiom,
! [X3,X2] :
~ ( left_apart_point(X2,reverse_line(X3))
| left_apart_point(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax10_basics) ).
fof(f169,plain,
left_apart_point(sK2,line_connecting(sK1,sK0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f130]) ).
fof(f130,plain,
( ~ right_apart_point(sK0,line_connecting(sK1,sK2))
& left_apart_point(sK2,line_connecting(sK1,sK0))
& distinct_points(sK1,sK0) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f128,f129]) ).
fof(f129,plain,
( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ right_apart_point(X0,line_connecting(X1,X2))
& left_apart_point(X2,line_connecting(X1,X0))
& distinct_points(X1,X0) )
=> ( ~ right_apart_point(sK0,line_connecting(sK1,sK2))
& left_apart_point(sK2,line_connecting(sK1,sK0))
& distinct_points(sK1,sK0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f128,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ right_apart_point(X0,line_connecting(X1,X2))
& left_apart_point(X2,line_connecting(X1,X0))
& distinct_points(X1,X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f82]) ).
fof(f82,plain,
? [X0,X2,X1] :
( ~ right_apart_point(X0,line_connecting(X2,X1))
& left_apart_point(X1,line_connecting(X2,X0))
& distinct_points(X2,X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f81]) ).
fof(f81,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ right_apart_point(X0,line_connecting(X2,X1))
& left_apart_point(X1,line_connecting(X2,X0))
& distinct_points(X2,X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).
fof(f40,plain,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X2,X0)
=> ( left_apart_point(X1,line_connecting(X2,X0))
=> right_apart_point(X0,line_connecting(X2,X1)) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f38]) ).
fof(f38,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X5,X6,X2] :
( distinct_points(X2,X5)
=> ( left_apart_point(X6,line_connecting(X2,X5))
=> right_apart_point(X5,line_connecting(X2,X6)) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f37]) ).
fof(f37,conjecture,
! [X5,X6,X2] :
( distinct_points(X2,X5)
=> ( left_apart_point(X6,line_connecting(X2,X5))
=> right_apart_point(X5,line_connecting(X2,X6)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : GEO245+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 21:46:28 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.48 % (11806)dis+1002_1:1_aac=none:bd=off:sac=on:sos=on:spb=units:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.19/0.48 % (11806)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.19/0.48 % (11806)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 % (11806)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.48 % (11806)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.48 % (11806)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.19/0.48 % (11806)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 % (11806)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 0.19/0.48 % (11806)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.48 % (11806)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.19/0.48 % (11806)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 % (11806)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (11819)lrs+10_1:1_drc=off:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (11819)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.49 % (11828)dis+10_1:1_av=off:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity:ss=included:st=2.0:to=lpo:urr=ec_only:i=45:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/45Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (11819)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 % (11819)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (11819)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.49 % (11819)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.49 % (11819)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 % (11819)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.19/0.49 % (11819)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.49 % (11819)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.19/0.49 % (11819)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (11819)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (11800)Success in time 0.154 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------