TSTP Solution File: GEO245+3 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : GEO245+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 05:25:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   26 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (  10   ~;   1   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   2 sgn  19   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax10_basics,axiom,
    ! [A,L] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point(A,L)
        | left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L)) ) ).

fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( distinct_points(A,B)
     => ( left_apart_point(C,line_connecting(A,B))
       => right_apart_point(B,line_connecting(A,C)) ) ) ).

fof(subgoal_0,plain,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( distinct_points(A,B)
        & left_apart_point(C,line_connecting(A,B)) )
     => right_apart_point(B,line_connecting(A,C)) ),
    inference(strip,[],[con]) ).

fof(negate_0_0,plain,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( ( distinct_points(A,B)
          & left_apart_point(C,line_connecting(A,B)) )
       => right_apart_point(B,line_connecting(A,C)) ),
    inference(negate,[],[subgoal_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_0,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( ~ right_apart_point(B,line_connecting(A,C))
      & distinct_points(A,B)
      & left_apart_point(C,line_connecting(A,B)) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_1,plain,
    ( ~ right_apart_point(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,line_connecting(skolemFOFtoCNF_A,skolemFOFtoCNF_C))
    & distinct_points(skolemFOFtoCNF_A,skolemFOFtoCNF_B)
    & left_apart_point(skolemFOFtoCNF_C,line_connecting(skolemFOFtoCNF_A,skolemFOFtoCNF_B)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_2,plain,
    left_apart_point(skolemFOFtoCNF_C,line_connecting(skolemFOFtoCNF_A,skolemFOFtoCNF_B)),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_1]) ).

fof(normalize_0_3,plain,
    ( ! [A,L] : ~ left_apart_point(A,L)
    & ! [A,L] : ~ left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L)) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[ax10_basics]) ).

fof(normalize_0_4,plain,
    ! [A,L] : ~ left_apart_point(A,L),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_3]) ).

fof(normalize_0_5,plain,
    ! [A,L] : ~ left_apart_point(A,L),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    left_apart_point(skolemFOFtoCNF_C,line_connecting(skolemFOFtoCNF_A,skolemFOFtoCNF_B)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_2]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    ~ left_apart_point(A,L),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_5]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    ~ left_apart_point(skolemFOFtoCNF_C,line_connecting(skolemFOFtoCNF_A,skolemFOFtoCNF_B)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_1:[bind(A,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_C)),bind(L,$fot(line_connecting(skolemFOFtoCNF_A,skolemFOFtoCNF_B)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( left_apart_point(skolemFOFtoCNF_C,line_connecting(skolemFOFtoCNF_A,skolemFOFtoCNF_B)) )],[refute_0_0,refute_0_2]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : GEO245+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 10:52:43 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.20/0.36  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.36  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------