TSTP Solution File: GEO245+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem : GEO245+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 16 20:36:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.44s
% Output : Proof 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : GEO245+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Aug 31 07:06:17 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.14/0.35 Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.14/0.35 -h, -? prints this message.
% 0.14/0.35 -smt2 print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.14/0.35 -m, -model generate model.
% 0.14/0.35 -p, -proof generate proof.
% 0.14/0.35 -c, -core generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.14/0.35 -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.14/0.35 -t:timeout set timeout (in second).
% 0.14/0.35 -smt2status display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.14/0.35 -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.14/0.35 -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.14/0.35 -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.21/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.44 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.44 tff(left_apart_point_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44 left_apart_point: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(reverse_line_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44 reverse_line: $i > $i)).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(line_connecting_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44 line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i)).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(tptp_fun_B_1_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44 tptp_fun_B_1: $i)).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(tptp_fun_A_2_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44 tptp_fun_A_2: $i)).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(tptp_fun_C_0_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44 tptp_fun_C_0: $i)).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(distinct_points_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.44 distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(1,plain,
% 0.21/0.44 ((~(left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(line_connecting(A!2, C!0))) | (~distinct_points(A!2, B!1)) | (~left_apart_point(C!0, line_connecting(A!2, B!1))))) <=> (~(left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(line_connecting(A!2, C!0))) | (~distinct_points(A!2, B!1)) | (~left_apart_point(C!0, line_connecting(A!2, B!1)))))),
% 0.21/0.44 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(2,plain,
% 0.21/0.44 ((~![A: $i, B: $i, C: $i] : (left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(line_connecting(A, C))) | (~distinct_points(A, B)) | (~left_apart_point(C, line_connecting(A, B))))) <=> (~![A: $i, B: $i, C: $i] : (left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(line_connecting(A, C))) | (~distinct_points(A, B)) | (~left_apart_point(C, line_connecting(A, B)))))),
% 0.21/0.44 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(3,plain,
% 0.21/0.44 ((~![A: $i, B: $i, C: $i] : (distinct_points(A, B) => (left_apart_point(C, line_connecting(A, B)) => left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(line_connecting(A, C)))))) <=> (~![A: $i, B: $i, C: $i] : (left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(line_connecting(A, C))) | (~distinct_points(A, B)) | (~left_apart_point(C, line_connecting(A, B)))))),
% 0.21/0.44 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(4,axiom,(~![A: $i, B: $i, C: $i] : (distinct_points(A, B) => (left_apart_point(C, line_connecting(A, B)) => left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(line_connecting(A, C)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','con')).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(5,plain,
% 0.21/0.44 (~![A: $i, B: $i, C: $i] : (left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(line_connecting(A, C))) | (~distinct_points(A, B)) | (~left_apart_point(C, line_connecting(A, B))))),
% 0.21/0.44 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[4, 3])).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(6,plain,
% 0.21/0.44 (~![A: $i, B: $i, C: $i] : (left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(line_connecting(A, C))) | (~distinct_points(A, B)) | (~left_apart_point(C, line_connecting(A, B))))),
% 0.21/0.44 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[5, 2])).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(7,plain,
% 0.21/0.44 (~![A: $i, B: $i, C: $i] : (left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(line_connecting(A, C))) | (~distinct_points(A, B)) | (~left_apart_point(C, line_connecting(A, B))))),
% 0.21/0.44 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[6, 2])).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(8,plain,
% 0.21/0.44 (~![A: $i, B: $i, C: $i] : (left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(line_connecting(A, C))) | (~distinct_points(A, B)) | (~left_apart_point(C, line_connecting(A, B))))),
% 0.21/0.44 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7, 2])).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(9,plain,
% 0.21/0.44 (~![A: $i, B: $i, C: $i] : (left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(line_connecting(A, C))) | (~distinct_points(A, B)) | (~left_apart_point(C, line_connecting(A, B))))),
% 0.21/0.44 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8, 2])).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(10,plain,
% 0.21/0.44 (~![A: $i, B: $i, C: $i] : (left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(line_connecting(A, C))) | (~distinct_points(A, B)) | (~left_apart_point(C, line_connecting(A, B))))),
% 0.21/0.44 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 2])).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(11,plain,
% 0.21/0.44 (~![A: $i, B: $i, C: $i] : (left_apart_point(B, reverse_line(line_connecting(A, C))) | (~distinct_points(A, B)) | (~left_apart_point(C, line_connecting(A, B))))),
% 0.21/0.44 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[10, 2])).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(12,plain,(
% 0.21/0.44 ~(left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(line_connecting(A!2, C!0))) | (~distinct_points(A!2, B!1)) | (~left_apart_point(C!0, line_connecting(A!2, B!1))))),
% 0.21/0.44 inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[11])).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(13,plain,
% 0.21/0.44 (~(left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(line_connecting(A!2, C!0))) | (~distinct_points(A!2, B!1)) | (~left_apart_point(C!0, line_connecting(A!2, B!1))))),
% 0.21/0.44 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[12, 1])).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(14,plain,
% 0.21/0.44 (left_apart_point(C!0, line_connecting(A!2, B!1))),
% 0.21/0.44 inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[13])).
% 0.21/0.44 tff(15,plain,
% 0.21/0.44 ((left_apart_point(C!0, line_connecting(A!2, B!1)) | left_apart_point(C!0, reverse_line(line_connecting(A!2, B!1)))) | (~left_apart_point(C!0, line_connecting(A!2, B!1)))),
% 0.21/0.45 inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.45 tff(16,plain,
% 0.21/0.45 (left_apart_point(C!0, line_connecting(A!2, B!1)) | left_apart_point(C!0, reverse_line(line_connecting(A!2, B!1)))),
% 0.21/0.45 inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[15, 14])).
% 0.21/0.45 tff(17,plain,
% 0.21/0.45 (^[A: $i, L: $i] : refl((~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))) <=> (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))))),
% 0.21/0.45 inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.21/0.45 tff(18,plain,
% 0.21/0.45 (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))) <=> ![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.21/0.45 inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[17])).
% 0.21/0.45 tff(19,plain,
% 0.21/0.45 (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))) <=> ![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.21/0.45 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.45 tff(20,axiom,(![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax','oag10')).
% 0.21/0.45 tff(21,plain,
% 0.21/0.45 (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.21/0.45 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[20, 19])).
% 0.21/0.45 tff(22,plain,(
% 0.21/0.45 ![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.21/0.45 inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[21])).
% 0.21/0.45 tff(23,plain,
% 0.21/0.45 (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.21/0.45 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[22, 18])).
% 0.21/0.45 tff(24,plain,
% 0.21/0.45 ((~![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))) | (~(left_apart_point(C!0, line_connecting(A!2, B!1)) | left_apart_point(C!0, reverse_line(line_connecting(A!2, B!1)))))),
% 0.21/0.45 inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.45 tff(25,plain,
% 0.21/0.45 ($false),
% 0.21/0.45 inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[24, 23, 16])).
% 0.21/0.45 % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------