TSTP Solution File: GEO244+3 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : GEO244+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Wvf0p1zJob true
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:58:01 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.53s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 4 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 57 ( 4 ~; 2 |; 0 &; 46 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 9 ( 9 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 ^; 14 !; 0 ?; 14 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__1_type,type,
sk__1: $i ).
thf(sk__type,type,
sk_: $i ).
thf(distinct_points_type,type,
distinct_points: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(right_apart_point_type,type,
right_apart_point: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__2_type,type,
sk__2: $i ).
thf(left_apart_point_type,type,
left_apart_point: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(reverse_line_type,type,
reverse_line: $i > $i ).
thf(line_connecting_type,type,
line_connecting: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(con,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( distinct_points @ A @ B )
=> ( ( right_apart_point @ C @ ( line_connecting @ A @ B ) )
=> ( left_apart_point @ C @ ( line_connecting @ B @ A ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( distinct_points @ A @ B )
=> ( ( right_apart_point @ C @ ( line_connecting @ A @ B ) )
=> ( left_apart_point @ C @ ( line_connecting @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[con]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl67,plain,
right_apart_point @ sk__2 @ ( line_connecting @ sk_ @ sk__1 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(a2_defns,axiom,
! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( right_apart_point @ X @ Y )
<=> ( left_apart_point @ X @ ( reverse_line @ Y ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( left_apart_point @ X0 @ ( reverse_line @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( right_apart_point @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[a2_defns]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl111,plain,
left_apart_point @ sk__2 @ ( reverse_line @ ( line_connecting @ sk_ @ sk__1 ) ),
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl67,zip_derived_cl2]) ).
thf(ax10_basics,axiom,
! [A: $i,L: $i] :
~ ( ( left_apart_point @ A @ L )
| ( left_apart_point @ A @ ( reverse_line @ L ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl47,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
~ ( left_apart_point @ X0 @ X1 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax10_basics]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl139,plain,
$false,
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl111,zip_derived_cl47]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : GEO244+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Wvf0p1zJob true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 23:39:07 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.53/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.53/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.53/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.53/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.53/0.74 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.53/0.74 % BCE start: 70
% 0.53/0.74 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.53/0.74 % PE start: 70
% 0.53/0.74 logic: neq
% 0.53/0.74 % PE eliminated: 30
% 0.53/0.74 % done 20 iterations in 0.023s
% 0.53/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.53/0.74 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.53/0.74
% 0.53/0.74
% 0.53/0.74 % Terminating...
% 0.53/0.77 % Runner terminated.
% 1.52/0.78 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------