%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GEO244+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uthwbfeHNz true

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:58:00 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.82s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   3 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   11 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   42 (   3   ~;   1   |;   0   &;  34   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   7   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0   ^;  10   !;   0   ?;  10   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__2_type,type,
    sk__2: $i ).

thf(left_apart_point_type,type,
    left_apart_point: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(line_connecting_type,type,
    line_connecting: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk__type,type,
    sk_: $i ).

thf(sk__1_type,type,
    sk__1: $i ).

thf(distinct_points_type,type,
    distinct_points: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(reverse_line_type,type,
    reverse_line: $i > $i ).

thf(con,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( distinct_points @ A @ B )
     => ( ( left_apart_point @ C @ ( reverse_line @ ( line_connecting @ A @ B ) ) )
       => ( left_apart_point @ C @ ( line_connecting @ B @ A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( distinct_points @ A @ B )
       => ( ( left_apart_point @ C @ ( reverse_line @ ( line_connecting @ A @ B ) ) )
         => ( left_apart_point @ C @ ( line_connecting @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[con]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl59,plain,
    left_apart_point @ sk__2 @ ( reverse_line @ ( line_connecting @ sk_ @ sk__1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(oag10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,L: $i] :
      ~ ( ( left_apart_point @ A @ L )
        | ( left_apart_point @ A @ ( reverse_line @ L ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl39,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point @ X0 @ X1 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[oag10]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl106,plain,
    $false,
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl59,zip_derived_cl39]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : GEO244+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uthwbfeHNz true
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 22:15:12 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.67  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.67  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.67  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.81  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.82  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.21/0.82  % BCE start: 62
% 0.21/0.82  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.21/0.82  % PE start: 62
% 0.21/0.82  logic: neq
% 0.21/0.82  % PE eliminated: 23
% 0.21/0.82  % done 11 iterations in 0.025s
% 0.21/0.82  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.21/0.82  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.82  
% 0.21/0.82  
% 0.21/0.82  % Terminating...
% 1.05/0.88  % Runner terminated.
% 1.05/0.89  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------