TSTP Solution File: GEO244+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : GEO244+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May 1 02:23:14 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.62s 0.80s
% Output : Refutation 0.62s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 31 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 30 ( 11 ~; 1 |; 11 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 15 !; 9 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f69,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f55,f60]) ).
fof(f60,plain,
! [X0,X1] : ~ left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).
fof(f45,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1))
& ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f15,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
~ ( left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1))
| left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xS2BBG0OWj/Vampire---4.8_15509',oag10) ).
fof(f55,plain,
left_apart_point(sK2,reverse_line(line_connecting(sK0,sK1))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f53,plain,
( ~ left_apart_point(sK2,line_connecting(sK1,sK0))
& left_apart_point(sK2,reverse_line(line_connecting(sK0,sK1)))
& distinct_points(sK0,sK1) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f42,f52]) ).
fof(f52,plain,
( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X2,line_connecting(X1,X0))
& left_apart_point(X2,reverse_line(line_connecting(X0,X1)))
& distinct_points(X0,X1) )
=> ( ~ left_apart_point(sK2,line_connecting(sK1,sK0))
& left_apart_point(sK2,reverse_line(line_connecting(sK0,sK1)))
& distinct_points(sK0,sK1) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f42,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X2,line_connecting(X1,X0))
& left_apart_point(X2,reverse_line(line_connecting(X0,X1)))
& distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f41]) ).
fof(f41,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ left_apart_point(X2,line_connecting(X1,X0))
& left_apart_point(X2,reverse_line(line_connecting(X0,X1)))
& distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X0,X1)
=> ( left_apart_point(X2,reverse_line(line_connecting(X0,X1)))
=> left_apart_point(X2,line_connecting(X1,X0)) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f33]) ).
fof(f33,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X3,X4] :
( distinct_points(X0,X3)
=> ( left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(line_connecting(X0,X3)))
=> left_apart_point(X4,line_connecting(X3,X0)) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f32]) ).
fof(f32,conjecture,
! [X0,X3,X4] :
( distinct_points(X0,X3)
=> ( left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(line_connecting(X0,X3)))
=> left_apart_point(X4,line_connecting(X3,X0)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xS2BBG0OWj/Vampire---4.8_15509',con) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : GEO244+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.11/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 18:51:18 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.32 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.11/0.32 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xS2BBG0OWj/Vampire---4.8_15509
% 0.62/0.80 % (15620)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.62/0.80 % (15618)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.80 % (15621)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.62/0.80 % (15623)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.62/0.80 % (15619)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.62/0.80 % (15622)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.80 % (15624)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.62/0.80 % (15625)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.62/0.80 % (15623)First to succeed.
% 0.62/0.80 % (15618)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.80 % (15625)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.80 % (15623)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.62/0.80 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.62/0.80 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.62/0.80 % (15623)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.80 % (15623)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.62/0.80 % (15623)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.62/0.80
% 0.62/0.80 % (15623)Memory used [KB]: 972
% 0.62/0.80 % (15623)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.62/0.80 % (15623)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.62/0.80 % (15623)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.80 % (15623)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.80 % (15616)Success in time 0.481 s
% 0.62/0.80 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------