%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : GEO244+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:09:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   6   ~;   1   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   2 sgn  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X4,X5] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X4)
     => ( left_apart_point(X5,reverse_line(line_connecting(X1,X4)))
       => left_apart_point(X5,line_connecting(X4,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(oag10,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point(X1,X2)
        | left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax',oag10) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X4,X5] :
        ( distinct_points(X1,X4)
       => ( left_apart_point(X5,reverse_line(line_connecting(X1,X4)))
         => left_apart_point(X5,line_connecting(X4,X1)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & left_apart_point(esk3_0,reverse_line(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
    & ~ left_apart_point(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X40,X41] :
      ( ~ left_apart_point(X40,X41)
      & ~ left_apart_point(X40,reverse_line(X41)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[oag10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    left_apart_point(esk3_0,reverse_line(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GEO244+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 07:10:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI
% 0.12/0.37  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.12/0.37  #
% 0.12/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # Proof found!
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.37  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.37  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------