TSTP Solution File: GEO242+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : GEO242+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:34:37 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (   9   ~;   1   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   2 sgn;  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X4,X2] :
      ( ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
        & distinct_points(X1,X4)
        & left_convergent_lines(X2,reverse_line(line_connecting(X1,X4))) )
     => left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Yb7qCqK4k3/E---3.1_17978.p',con) ).

fof(oag11,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ~ ( left_convergent_lines(X2,X3)
        | left_convergent_lines(X2,reverse_line(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Yb7qCqK4k3/E---3.1_17978.p',oag11) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X4,X2] :
        ( ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
          & distinct_points(X1,X4)
          & left_convergent_lines(X2,reverse_line(line_connecting(X1,X4))) )
       => left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    & distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & left_convergent_lines(esk3_0,reverse_line(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
    & ~ left_apart_point(esk2_0,reverse_line(esk3_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X20,X21] :
      ( ~ left_convergent_lines(X20,X21)
      & ~ left_convergent_lines(X20,reverse_line(X21)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[oag11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    left_convergent_lines(esk3_0,reverse_line(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : GEO242+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 06:22:49 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Yb7qCqK4k3/E---3.1_17978.p
% 0.21/0.50  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # new_bool_3 with pid 18110 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50  # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with pid 18114 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50  # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 32
% 0.21/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 17
% 0.21/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 26
% 0.21/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 26
% 0.21/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 9
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.21/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 8
% 0.21/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.21/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 6
% 0.21/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.21/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.21/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 0.21/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 48
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.21/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.21/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1451
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1856 pages
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
% 0.21/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------