TSTP Solution File: GEO242+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : GEO242+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:58:52 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 19 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 9 ~; 1 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 2 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X1,X4,X2] :
( ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
& distinct_points(X1,X4)
& left_convergent_lines(X2,reverse_line(line_connecting(X1,X4))) )
=> left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(oag11,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
~ ( left_convergent_lines(X2,X3)
| left_convergent_lines(X2,reverse_line(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax',oag11) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X4,X2] :
( ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
& distinct_points(X1,X4)
& left_convergent_lines(X2,reverse_line(line_connecting(X1,X4))) )
=> left_apart_point(X4,reverse_line(X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
& distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& left_convergent_lines(esk3_0,reverse_line(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
& ~ left_apart_point(esk2_0,reverse_line(esk3_0)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X20,X21] :
( ~ left_convergent_lines(X20,X21)
& ~ left_convergent_lines(X20,reverse_line(X21)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[oag11])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
left_convergent_lines(esk3_0,reverse_line(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.12 % Problem : GEO242+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.09/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 14:03:38 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # new_bool_1 with pid 2743 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.46 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with pid 2745 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.46 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 32
% 0.19/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 17
% 0.19/0.46 # Initial clauses : 26
% 0.19/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 26
% 0.19/0.46 # Processed clauses : 9
% 0.19/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.19/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.19/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.19/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.19/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.19/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.19/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.19/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 0.19/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 48
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.19/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1632
% 0.19/0.46 # Search garbage collected termcells : 412
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.46 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.46 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages
% 0.19/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------