TSTP Solution File: GEO240+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GEO240+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.540wXBPibl true

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:57:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.56s
% Output   : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   3 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   11 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (   5   ~;   1   |;   2   &;  30   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0   ^;  10   !;   0   ?;  10   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__2_type,type,
    sk__2: $i ).

thf(left_apart_point_type,type,
    left_apart_point: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(line_connecting_type,type,
    line_connecting: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk__1_type,type,
    sk__1: $i ).

thf(apart_point_and_line_type,type,
    apart_point_and_line: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(left_convergent_lines_type,type,
    left_convergent_lines: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(reverse_line_type,type,
    reverse_line: $i > $i ).

thf(con,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,L: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( apart_point_and_line @ A @ L )
        & ( left_apart_point @ B @ ( reverse_line @ L ) ) )
     => ( left_convergent_lines @ L @ ( reverse_line @ ( line_connecting @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,L: $i] :
        ( ( ~ ( apart_point_and_line @ A @ L )
          & ( left_apart_point @ B @ ( reverse_line @ L ) ) )
       => ( left_convergent_lines @ L @ ( reverse_line @ ( line_connecting @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[con]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl60,plain,
    left_apart_point @ sk__1 @ ( reverse_line @ sk__2 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(oag10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,L: $i] :
      ~ ( ( left_apart_point @ A @ L )
        | ( left_apart_point @ A @ ( reverse_line @ L ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl39,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point @ X0 @ X1 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[oag10]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl63,plain,
    $false,
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl60,zip_derived_cl39]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.08  % Problem  : GEO240+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.05/0.09  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.540wXBPibl true
% 0.08/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 20:56:47 EDT 2023
% 0.08/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.28  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.08/0.28  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.28  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.08/0.28  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.08/0.28  % Running in FO mode
% 0.13/0.46  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.13/0.46  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.13/0.46  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.13/0.53  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.13/0.53  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.13/0.53  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.13/0.53  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.13/0.53  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.13/0.54  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.13/0.55  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.13/0.56  % Solved by fo/fo1_av.sh.
% 0.13/0.56  % done 11 iterations in 0.011s
% 0.13/0.56  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.13/0.56  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.56  
% 0.13/0.56  
% 0.13/0.56  % Terminating...
% 1.06/0.67  % Runner terminated.
% 1.06/0.69  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------