TSTP Solution File: GEO240+1 by PyRes---1.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.3
% Problem  : GEO240+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 05:59:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.37s 0.57s
% Output   : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GEO240+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 00:57:27 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.37/0.57  # Version:  1.3
% 0.37/0.57  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/0.57  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.37/0.57  fof(oag10,axiom,(![A]:(![L]:(~(left_apart_point(A,L)|left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L)))))),input).
% 0.37/0.57  fof(c67,axiom,(![A]:(![L]:(~left_apart_point(A,L)&~left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[oag10])).
% 0.37/0.57  fof(c68,axiom,((![A]:(![L]:~left_apart_point(A,L)))&(![A]:(![L]:~left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(L))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[c67])).
% 0.37/0.57  fof(c70,axiom,(![X43]:(![X44]:(![X45]:(![X46]:(~left_apart_point(X43,X44)&~left_apart_point(X45,reverse_line(X46))))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c69,axiom,((![X43]:(![X44]:~left_apart_point(X43,X44)))&(![X45]:(![X46]:~left_apart_point(X45,reverse_line(X46))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c68])).])).
% 0.37/0.57  cnf(c71,axiom,~left_apart_point(X97,X96),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c70])).
% 0.37/0.57  fof(con,conjecture,(![A]:(![B]:(![L]:(((~apart_point_and_line(A,L))&left_apart_point(B,reverse_line(L)))=>left_convergent_lines(L,reverse_line(line_connecting(A,B))))))),input).
% 0.37/0.57  fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(![A]:(![B]:(![L]:(((~apart_point_and_line(A,L))&left_apart_point(B,reverse_line(L)))=>left_convergent_lines(L,reverse_line(line_connecting(A,B)))))))),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[con])).
% 0.37/0.57  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(~(![A]:(![B]:(![L]:((~apart_point_and_line(A,L)&left_apart_point(B,reverse_line(L)))=>left_convergent_lines(L,reverse_line(line_connecting(A,B)))))))),inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[c0])).
% 0.37/0.57  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,(?[A]:(?[B]:(?[L]:((~apart_point_and_line(A,L)&left_apart_point(B,reverse_line(L)))&~left_convergent_lines(L,reverse_line(line_connecting(A,B))))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c1])).
% 0.37/0.57  fof(c3,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:(?[X3]:(?[X4]:((~apart_point_and_line(X2,X4)&left_apart_point(X3,reverse_line(X4)))&~left_convergent_lines(X4,reverse_line(line_connecting(X2,X3))))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c2])).
% 0.37/0.57  fof(c4,negated_conjecture,((~apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,skolem0003)&left_apart_point(skolem0002,reverse_line(skolem0003)))&~left_convergent_lines(skolem0003,reverse_line(line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002)))),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c3])).
% 0.37/0.57  cnf(c6,negated_conjecture,left_apart_point(skolem0002,reverse_line(skolem0003)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c4])).
% 0.37/0.57  cnf(c163,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c6, c71])).
% 0.37/0.57  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.37/0.57  
% 0.37/0.57  # Initial clauses    : 61
% 0.37/0.57  # Processed clauses  : 10
% 0.37/0.57  # Factors computed   : 0
% 0.37/0.57  # Resolvents computed: 1
% 0.37/0.57  # Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.37/0.57  # Forward subsumed   : 2
% 0.37/0.57  # Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.37/0.57  # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.37/0.57  # User time          : 0.218 s
% 0.37/0.57  # System time        : 0.017 s
% 0.37/0.57  # Total time         : 0.235 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------