TSTP Solution File: GEO239+3 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : GEO239+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 16 20:35:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.43s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GEO239+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Aug 31 07:09:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.12/0.34  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.12/0.34    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.12/0.34    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.12/0.34    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.12/0.34    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.12/0.34    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.12/0.34    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.12/0.34    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.12/0.34    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.12/0.34    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.12/0.34    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.12/0.34    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.19/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.43  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.43  tff(left_apart_point_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.43     left_apart_point: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(reverse_line_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.43     reverse_line: $i > $i)).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(tptp_fun_L_0_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.43     tptp_fun_L_0: $i)).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(tptp_fun_B_1_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.43     tptp_fun_B_1: $i)).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(incident_point_and_line_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.43     incident_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(tptp_fun_A_2_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.43     tptp_fun_A_2: $i)).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(left_convergent_lines_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.43     left_convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(line_connecting_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.43     line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i)).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(1,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      ((~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(incident_point_and_line(A, L) & left_apart_point(B, L))) | left_convergent_lines(L, line_connecting(A, B)))) <=> (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(incident_point_and_line(A, L) & left_apart_point(B, L))) | left_convergent_lines(L, line_connecting(A, B))))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(2,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      ((~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((incident_point_and_line(A, L) & left_apart_point(B, L)) => left_convergent_lines(L, line_connecting(A, B)))) <=> (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(incident_point_and_line(A, L) & left_apart_point(B, L))) | left_convergent_lines(L, line_connecting(A, B))))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(3,axiom,(~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((incident_point_and_line(A, L) & left_apart_point(B, L)) => left_convergent_lines(L, line_connecting(A, B)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','con')).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(4,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(incident_point_and_line(A, L) & left_apart_point(B, L))) | left_convergent_lines(L, line_connecting(A, B)))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[3, 2])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(5,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(incident_point_and_line(A, L) & left_apart_point(B, L))) | left_convergent_lines(L, line_connecting(A, B)))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[4, 1])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(6,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(incident_point_and_line(A, L) & left_apart_point(B, L))) | left_convergent_lines(L, line_connecting(A, B)))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[5, 1])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(7,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(incident_point_and_line(A, L) & left_apart_point(B, L))) | left_convergent_lines(L, line_connecting(A, B)))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[6, 1])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(8,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(incident_point_and_line(A, L) & left_apart_point(B, L))) | left_convergent_lines(L, line_connecting(A, B)))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7, 1])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(9,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(incident_point_and_line(A, L) & left_apart_point(B, L))) | left_convergent_lines(L, line_connecting(A, B)))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8, 1])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(10,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(incident_point_and_line(A, L) & left_apart_point(B, L))) | left_convergent_lines(L, line_connecting(A, B)))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 1])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(11,plain,(
% 0.19/0.43      ~((~(incident_point_and_line(A!2, L!0) & left_apart_point(B!1, L!0))) | left_convergent_lines(L!0, line_connecting(A!2, B!1)))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[10])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(12,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      (incident_point_and_line(A!2, L!0) & left_apart_point(B!1, L!0)),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[11])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(13,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      (left_apart_point(B!1, L!0)),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(and_elim,[status(thm)],[12])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(14,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      ((left_apart_point(B!1, L!0) | left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(L!0))) | (~left_apart_point(B!1, L!0))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(15,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      (left_apart_point(B!1, L!0) | left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(L!0))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[14, 13])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(16,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      (^[A: $i, L: $i] : refl((~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))) <=> (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(17,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))) <=> ![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[16])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(18,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))) <=> ![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(19,axiom,(![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO009+0.ax','ax10_basics')).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(20,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[19, 18])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(21,plain,(
% 0.19/0.43      ![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[20])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(22,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[21, 17])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(23,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      ((~![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))) | (~(left_apart_point(B!1, L!0) | left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(L!0))))),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.43  tff(24,plain,
% 0.19/0.43      ($false),
% 0.19/0.43      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[23, 22, 15])).
% 0.19/0.43  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------