TSTP Solution File: GEO239+3 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : GEO239+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 11:14:57 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  12   ~;   2   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (  20   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f157,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f143,f118]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    left_apart_point(sK2,sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f115]) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    ( ~ left_convergent_lines(sK3,line_connecting(sK1,sK2))
    & left_apart_point(sK2,sK3) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f75,f114]) ).

fof(f114,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ~ left_convergent_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
        & left_apart_point(X1,X2) )
   => ( ~ left_convergent_lines(sK3,line_connecting(sK1,sK2))
      & left_apart_point(sK2,sK3) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ left_convergent_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      & left_apart_point(X1,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f74]) ).

fof(f74,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( left_apart_point(X1,X2)
       => left_convergent_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(pure_predicate_removal,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( left_apart_point(X1,X2)
          & incident_point_and_line(X0,X2) )
       => left_convergent_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2,X5,X3] :
        ( ( left_apart_point(X5,X3)
          & incident_point_and_line(X2,X3) )
       => left_convergent_lines(X3,line_connecting(X2,X5)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f37,conjecture,
    ! [X2,X5,X3] :
      ( ( left_apart_point(X5,X3)
        & incident_point_and_line(X2,X3) )
     => left_convergent_lines(X3,line_connecting(X2,X5)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f93]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1))
      & ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f58]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1))
        | left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f20,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point(X2,reverse_line(X3))
        | left_apart_point(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax10_basics) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : GEO239+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 05:50:06 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.35  % (3588)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.12/0.36  % (3592)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.36  % (3593)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.36  % (3594)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.36  % (3590)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.36  % (3595)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.36  % (3591)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.36  % (3589)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.36  % (3593)First to succeed.
% 0.12/0.37  % (3594)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.12/0.37  TRYING [1]
% 0.12/0.37  % (3595)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.12/0.37  % (3593)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.37  % (3593)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.37  % (3593)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.12/0.37  % (3593)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % (3593)Memory used [KB]: 832
% 0.12/0.37  % (3593)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.37  % (3593)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.12/0.37  % (3593)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.37  % (3593)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.37  % (3588)Success in time 0.019 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------