TSTP Solution File: GEO239+3 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : GEO239+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:31:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GEO239+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 18:37:17 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.40  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.18/0.40  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.18/0.40  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.18/0.40  1. (left_apart_point T_0 T_1) (-. (left_apart_point T_0 T_1))   ### Axiom
% 0.18/0.40  2. (-. ((left_apart_point T_0 T_1) \/ (left_apart_point T_0 (reverse_line T_1)))) (left_apart_point T_0 T_1)   ### NotOr 1
% 0.18/0.40  3. (All L, (-. ((left_apart_point T_0 L) \/ (left_apart_point T_0 (reverse_line L))))) (left_apart_point T_0 T_1)   ### All 2
% 0.18/0.40  4. (All A, (All L, (-. ((left_apart_point A L) \/ (left_apart_point A (reverse_line L)))))) (left_apart_point T_0 T_1)   ### All 3
% 0.18/0.40  5. (-. (((incident_point_and_line T_2 T_1) /\ (left_apart_point T_0 T_1)) => (left_convergent_lines T_1 (line_connecting T_2 T_0)))) (All A, (All L, (-. ((left_apart_point A L) \/ (left_apart_point A (reverse_line L))))))   ### ConjTree 4
% 0.18/0.40  6. (-. (All L, (((incident_point_and_line T_2 L) /\ (left_apart_point T_0 L)) => (left_convergent_lines L (line_connecting T_2 T_0))))) (All A, (All L, (-. ((left_apart_point A L) \/ (left_apart_point A (reverse_line L))))))   ### NotAllEx 5
% 0.18/0.40  7. (-. (All B, (All L, (((incident_point_and_line T_2 L) /\ (left_apart_point B L)) => (left_convergent_lines L (line_connecting T_2 B)))))) (All A, (All L, (-. ((left_apart_point A L) \/ (left_apart_point A (reverse_line L))))))   ### NotAllEx 6
% 0.18/0.40  8. (-. (All A, (All B, (All L, (((incident_point_and_line A L) /\ (left_apart_point B L)) => (left_convergent_lines L (line_connecting A B))))))) (All A, (All L, (-. ((left_apart_point A L) \/ (left_apart_point A (reverse_line L))))))   ### NotAllEx 7
% 0.18/0.40  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.18/0.40  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------