TSTP Solution File: GEO236+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : GEO236+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 05:16:19 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  15   ~;   3   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (  12   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f143,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f128,f104]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    left_apart_point(sK1,reverse_line(sK3)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(sK2,sK3)
    & ~ unequally_directed_lines(sK2,sK3)
    & left_apart_point(sK1,reverse_line(sK3))
    & left_apart_point(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f61,f99]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2)
        & ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
        & left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X2))
        & left_apart_point(X0,X1) )
   => ( ~ distinct_lines(sK2,sK3)
      & ~ unequally_directed_lines(sK2,sK3)
      & left_apart_point(sK1,reverse_line(sK3))
      & left_apart_point(sK1,sK2) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2)
      & ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
      & left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X2))
      & left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f60]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2)
      & ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
      & left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X2))
      & left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X2))
          & left_apart_point(X0,X1) )
       => ( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
          | unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f32,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X2))
        & left_apart_point(X0,X1) )
     => ( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
        | unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f128,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1))
      & ~ left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point(X0,reverse_line(X1))
        | left_apart_point(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',oag10) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : GEO236+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.14/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 22:02:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  % (17919)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.21/0.37  % (17923)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (17920)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (17921)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (17924)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (17925)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (17926)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (17922)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (17924)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.37  % (17925)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.37  % (17924)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-17919"
% 0.21/0.37  % (17922)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.37  % (17924)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.37  % (17924)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.37  % (17924)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.21/0.37  % (17924)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  % (17924)Memory used [KB]: 830
% 0.21/0.37  % (17924)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.37  % (17924)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.37  % (17919)Success in time 0.02 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------