TSTP Solution File: GEO235+3 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : GEO235+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 16 20:35:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GEO235+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Aug 31 07:05:35 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.14/0.35  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.14/0.35    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.14/0.35    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.14/0.35    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.14/0.35    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.14/0.35    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.14/0.35    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.14/0.35    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.14/0.35    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.14/0.35    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.14/0.35    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.14/0.35    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.14/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.40  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.14/0.40  tff(left_apart_point_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.40     left_apart_point: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(reverse_line_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.40     reverse_line: $i > $i)).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(tptp_fun_L_0_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.40     tptp_fun_L_0: $i)).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(tptp_fun_B_1_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.40     tptp_fun_B_1: $i)).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(right_apart_point_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.40     right_apart_point: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(tptp_fun_A_2_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.40     tptp_fun_A_2: $i)).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(distinct_points_type, type, (
% 0.14/0.40     distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(1,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      (^[X: $i, Y: $i] : refl((right_apart_point(X, Y) <=> left_apart_point(X, reverse_line(Y))) <=> (right_apart_point(X, Y) <=> left_apart_point(X, reverse_line(Y))))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(2,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : (right_apart_point(X, Y) <=> left_apart_point(X, reverse_line(Y))) <=> ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (right_apart_point(X, Y) <=> left_apart_point(X, reverse_line(Y)))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[1])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(3,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : (right_apart_point(X, Y) <=> left_apart_point(X, reverse_line(Y))) <=> ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (right_apart_point(X, Y) <=> left_apart_point(X, reverse_line(Y)))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(4,axiom,(![X: $i, Y: $i] : (right_apart_point(X, Y) <=> left_apart_point(X, reverse_line(Y)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO009+0.ax','a2_defns')).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(5,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : (right_apart_point(X, Y) <=> left_apart_point(X, reverse_line(Y)))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[4, 3])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(6,plain,(
% 0.14/0.40      ![X: $i, Y: $i] : (right_apart_point(X, Y) <=> left_apart_point(X, reverse_line(Y)))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[5])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(7,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : (right_apart_point(X, Y) <=> left_apart_point(X, reverse_line(Y)))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[6, 2])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(8,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      ((~![X: $i, Y: $i] : (right_apart_point(X, Y) <=> left_apart_point(X, reverse_line(Y)))) | (right_apart_point(B!1, L!0) <=> left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(L!0)))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(9,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      (right_apart_point(B!1, L!0) <=> left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(L!0))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[8, 7])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(10,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      ((~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, L) & right_apart_point(B, L))) | distinct_points(A, B))) <=> (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, L) & right_apart_point(B, L))) | distinct_points(A, B)))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(11,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      ((~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((left_apart_point(A, L) & right_apart_point(B, L)) => distinct_points(A, B))) <=> (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, L) & right_apart_point(B, L))) | distinct_points(A, B)))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(12,axiom,(~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((left_apart_point(A, L) & right_apart_point(B, L)) => distinct_points(A, B))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','con')).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(13,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, L) & right_apart_point(B, L))) | distinct_points(A, B))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[12, 11])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(14,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, L) & right_apart_point(B, L))) | distinct_points(A, B))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[13, 10])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(15,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, L) & right_apart_point(B, L))) | distinct_points(A, B))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[14, 10])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(16,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, L) & right_apart_point(B, L))) | distinct_points(A, B))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[15, 10])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(17,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, L) & right_apart_point(B, L))) | distinct_points(A, B))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[16, 10])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(18,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, L) & right_apart_point(B, L))) | distinct_points(A, B))),
% 0.14/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[17, 10])).
% 0.14/0.40  tff(19,plain,
% 0.14/0.40      (~![A: $i, B: $i, L: $i] : ((~(left_apart_point(A, L) & right_apart_point(B, L))) | distinct_points(A, B))),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[18, 10])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(20,plain,(
% 0.21/0.41      ~((~(left_apart_point(A!2, L!0) & right_apart_point(B!1, L!0))) | distinct_points(A!2, B!1))),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[19])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(21,plain,
% 0.21/0.41      (left_apart_point(A!2, L!0) & right_apart_point(B!1, L!0)),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[20])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(22,plain,
% 0.21/0.41      (right_apart_point(B!1, L!0)),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(and_elim,[status(thm)],[21])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(23,plain,
% 0.21/0.41      ((~(right_apart_point(B!1, L!0) <=> left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(L!0)))) | (~right_apart_point(B!1, L!0)) | left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(L!0))),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(24,plain,
% 0.21/0.41      ((~(right_apart_point(B!1, L!0) <=> left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(L!0)))) | left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(L!0))),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[23, 22])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(25,plain,
% 0.21/0.41      (left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(L!0))),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[24, 9])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(26,plain,
% 0.21/0.41      ((left_apart_point(B!1, L!0) | left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(L!0))) | (~left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(L!0)))),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(27,plain,
% 0.21/0.41      (left_apart_point(B!1, L!0) | left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(L!0))),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[26, 25])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(28,plain,
% 0.21/0.41      (^[A: $i, L: $i] : refl((~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))) <=> (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))))),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(29,plain,
% 0.21/0.41      (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))) <=> ![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[28])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(30,plain,
% 0.21/0.41      (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L)))) <=> ![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(31,axiom,(![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO009+0.ax','ax10_basics')).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(32,plain,
% 0.21/0.41      (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[31, 30])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(33,plain,(
% 0.21/0.41      ![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[32])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(34,plain,
% 0.21/0.41      (![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[33, 29])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(35,plain,
% 0.21/0.41      ((~![A: $i, L: $i] : (~(left_apart_point(A, L) | left_apart_point(A, reverse_line(L))))) | (~(left_apart_point(B!1, L!0) | left_apart_point(B!1, reverse_line(L!0))))),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.41  tff(36,plain,
% 0.21/0.41      ($false),
% 0.21/0.41      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[35, 34, 27])).
% 0.21/0.41  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------