%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : GEO235+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : n009.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 16091.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Apr  1 13:39:16 EDT 2016

% Result   : Theorem 0.06s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (  10   ~;   1   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   2 sgn  12   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(3,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ~ ( left_apart_point(X1,X4)
        | left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp58jHRY/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',oag10) ).

fof(5,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X4] :
      ( ( left_apart_point(X1,X4)
        & left_apart_point(X2,reverse_line(X4)) )
     => distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp58jHRY/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',con) ).

fof(6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X4] :
        ( ( left_apart_point(X1,X4)
          & left_apart_point(X2,reverse_line(X4)) )
       => distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[5]) ).

fof(13,plain,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ( ~ left_apart_point(X1,X4)
      & ~ left_apart_point(X1,reverse_line(X4)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

fof(14,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( ~ left_apart_point(X5,X6)
      & ~ left_apart_point(X5,reverse_line(X6)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

cnf(16,plain,
    ~ left_apart_point(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

fof(20,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2,X4] :
      ( left_apart_point(X1,X4)
      & left_apart_point(X2,reverse_line(X4))
      & ~ distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

fof(21,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X5,X6,X7] :
      ( left_apart_point(X5,X7)
      & left_apart_point(X6,reverse_line(X7))
      & ~ distinct_points(X5,X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

fof(22,negated_conjecture,
    ( left_apart_point(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    & left_apart_point(esk2_0,reverse_line(esk3_0))
    & ~ distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[21]) ).

cnf(25,negated_conjecture,
    left_apart_point(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

cnf(26,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[25,16,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    26,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO235+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.02/0.23  % Computer : n009.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.23  % Memory   : 16091.75MB
% 0.02/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.23  % DateTime : Fri Apr  1 11:14:38 CDT 2016
% 0.02/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.27  % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.27  --creating new selector for [GEO007+0.ax]
% 0.06/0.33  -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp58jHRY/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.06/0.33  -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp58jHRY/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.06/0.33  -prover status Theorem
% 0.06/0.33  Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.06/0.33  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.33  % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.33  Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.06/0.33  # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.06/0.33  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.06/0.33  # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.06/0.33  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------