TSTP Solution File: GEO233+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : GEO233+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:23:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.44s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 8 unt; 3 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
~ unequally_directed_lines(u,u),
file('GEO233+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(5,axiom,
~ left_convergent_lines(u,v),
file('GEO233+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(6,axiom,
unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(reverse_line(skc1)),skc1),
file('GEO233+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(25,axiom,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,v)
| unequally_directed_lines(v,w)
| unequally_directed_lines(u,w) ),
file('GEO233+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(53,axiom,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,v)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,reverse_line(v))
| left_convergent_lines(u,v)
| left_convergent_lines(u,reverse_line(v)) ),
file('GEO233+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(60,plain,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,v)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,reverse_line(v)) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[53,5]),
[iquote('0:MRR:53.2,53.3,5.0,5.0')] ).
cnf(63,plain,
~ unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(reverse_line(skc1)),reverse_line(skc1)),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[6,60]),
[iquote('0:Res:6.0,60.0')] ).
cnf(64,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(skc1,u)
| unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(reverse_line(skc1)),u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[6,25]),
[iquote('0:Res:6.0,25.0')] ).
cnf(71,plain,
unequally_directed_lines(skc1,reverse_line(reverse_line(skc1))),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[64,3]),
[iquote('0:Res:64.1,3.0')] ).
cnf(72,plain,
unequally_directed_lines(skc1,reverse_line(skc1)),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[64,63]),
[iquote('0:Res:64.1,63.0')] ).
cnf(82,plain,
~ unequally_directed_lines(skc1,reverse_line(skc1)),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[71,60]),
[iquote('0:Res:71.0,60.1')] ).
cnf(83,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[82,72]),
[iquote('0:MRR:82.0,72.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO233+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 13:47:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.18/0.44 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.44 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44 SPASS derived 17 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 55 clauses.
% 0.18/0.44 SPASS allocated 97769 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.44 SPASS spent 0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.44 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.44 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.44 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.44 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.44 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44
% 0.18/0.44 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 12 :
% 0.18/0.44 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.44 Formulae used in the proof : oag5 oag11 con oag6 oag9
% 0.18/0.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------