TSTP Solution File: GEO233+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO233+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.35s 2.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 9 unt; 5 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 0 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_36,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xncgjmqn/input.p',i_0_36) ).
cnf(i_0_17,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(reverse_line(esk1_0)),esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xncgjmqn/input.p',i_0_17) ).
cnf(i_0_42,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xncgjmqn/input.p',i_0_42) ).
cnf(i_0_30,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xncgjmqn/input.p',i_0_30) ).
cnf(i_0_35,plain,
~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xncgjmqn/input.p',i_0_35) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X3,X1) ),
i_0_36 ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(reverse_line(esk1_0)),esk1_0),
i_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
i_0_42 ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
i_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X1),
i_0_35 ).
cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
( unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(reverse_line(esk1_0)),X1)
| unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(reverse_line(esk1_0))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(X1))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(reverse_line(esk1_0)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk1_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_49]),c_0_57]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO233+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 13:31:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.35/2.47 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 8.35/2.47 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.35/2.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 8.35/2.47
% 8.35/2.47 # Proof found!
% 8.35/2.47 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.35/2.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.35/2.47 # Proof object total steps : 16
% 8.35/2.47 # Proof object clause steps : 11
% 8.35/2.47 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 8.35/2.47 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 8.35/2.47 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 8.35/2.47 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 8.35/2.47 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 8.35/2.47 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 8.35/2.47 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 8.35/2.47 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 8.35/2.47 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.35/2.47 # Parsed axioms : 59
% 8.35/2.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.35/2.47 # Initial clauses : 59
% 8.35/2.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.35/2.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 59
% 8.35/2.47 # Processed clauses : 66
% 8.35/2.47 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 8.35/2.47 # ...subsumed : 26
% 8.35/2.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 40
% 8.35/2.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 8.35/2.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.35/2.47 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 8.35/2.47 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 8.35/2.47 # Generated clauses : 47
% 8.35/2.47 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 31
% 8.35/2.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 9
% 8.35/2.47 # Paramodulations : 45
% 8.35/2.47 # Factorizations : 2
% 8.35/2.47 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 8.35/2.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.35/2.47 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 8.35/2.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 39
% 8.35/2.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 8.35/2.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.35/2.47 # Negative unit clauses : 12
% 8.35/2.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 25
% 8.35/2.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22
% 8.35/2.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 70
% 8.35/2.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.35/2.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 8.35/2.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 164
% 8.35/2.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 108
% 8.35/2.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 15
% 8.35/2.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 69
% 8.35/2.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.35/2.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 8.35/2.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 8.35/2.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.35/2.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.35/2.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1659
% 8.35/2.47
% 8.35/2.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.35/2.47 # User time : 0.018 s
% 8.35/2.47 # System time : 0.003 s
% 8.35/2.47 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 8.35/2.47 # ...preprocessing : 0.018 s
% 8.35/2.47 # ...main loop : 0.002 s
% 8.35/2.47 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.35/2.47
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------