TSTP Solution File: GEO233+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : GEO233+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:43:54 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.41s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : GEO233+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 23:05:16 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.41/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.65  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.41/0.65  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.41/0.65  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.41/0.65  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.41/0.65  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.41/0.65  
% 0.41/0.65  % Result      :Theorem 0.020000s
% 0.41/0.65  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.020000s
% 0.41/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.65  % File     : GEO233+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.41/0.65  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.41/0.65  % Problem  : Reverse is idempotent for direction
% 0.41/0.65  % Version  : [vPl98] axioms : Especial.
% 0.41/0.65  % English  :
% 0.41/0.65  
% 0.41/0.65  % Refs     : [vPl98] von Plato (1998), A Constructive Theory of Ordered Aff
% 0.41/0.65  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.41/0.65  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 0.41/0.65  % Names    : Therorem 3.7 [vPl98]
% 0.41/0.65  
% 0.41/0.65  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.41/0.65  % Rating   : 0.07 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.14 v7.2.0, 0.17 v7.1.0, 0.25 v7.0.0, 0.00 v6.4.0
% 0.41/0.65  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   8 unt;   0 def)
% 0.41/0.65  %            Number of atoms       :  103 (   0 equ)
% 0.41/0.65  %            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
% 0.41/0.65  %            Number of connectives :   88 (  17   ~;  24   |;  25   &)
% 0.41/0.65  %                                         (   5 <=>;  17  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.41/0.65  %            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   6 avg)
% 0.41/0.65  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.41/0.65  %            Number of predicates  :   12 (  12 usr;   0 prp; 1-4 aty)
% 0.41/0.65  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.41/0.65  %            Number of variables   :   72 (  72   !;   0   ?)
% 0.41/0.65  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.41/0.65  
% 0.41/0.65  % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.41/0.65  % Bugfixes : v6.4.0 - Bugfix in GEO007+1.ax
% 0.41/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.65  include('Axioms/GEO007+0.ax').
% 0.41/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.65  fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.41/0.65      ! [L] : ~ unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(reverse_line(L)),L) ).
% 0.41/0.65  
% 0.41/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.65  % Proof found
% 0.41/0.65  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.41/0.65  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.41/0.65  %ClaNum:59(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.41/0.65  %VarNum:269(SingletonVarNum:105)
% 0.41/0.65  %MaxLitNum:10
% 0.41/0.65  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.41/0.65  %SharedTerms:4
% 0.41/0.65  %goalClause: 1
% 0.41/0.65  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.41/0.65  [1]P1(f2(f2(a1)),a1)
% 0.41/0.65  [3]~P1(x31,x31)
% 0.41/0.65  [4]~P3(x41,x41)
% 0.41/0.65  [5]~P4(x51,x51)
% 0.41/0.65  [8]~P4(x81,f2(x81))
% 0.41/0.65  [2]~P2(x21,x22)
% 0.41/0.65  [6]~P10(x61,x62)
% 0.41/0.65  [10]~P5(x101,f3(x102,x101))
% 0.41/0.65  [11]~P1(f3(x111,x112),x111)
% 0.41/0.65  [12]~P1(f4(x121,x122),f2(f4(x122,x121)))
% 0.41/0.65  [13]~P11(x131)+P11(f2(x131))
% 0.41/0.65  [15]~P6(x151,x152)+P1(x151,x152)
% 0.41/0.65  [16]~P6(x161,x162)+P1(x161,f2(x162))
% 0.41/0.65  [30]~P3(x301,x302)+~P5(x302,f4(x301,x302))
% 0.41/0.65  [31]~P3(x311,x312)+~P5(x311,f4(x311,x312))
% 0.41/0.66  [38]P3(x381,x382)+~P7(x383,x381,x382)
% 0.41/0.66  [51]~P7(x511,x512,x513)+~P1(x511,f4(x512,x513))
% 0.41/0.66  [17]~P11(x171)+~P12(x172)+P11(f3(x171,x172))
% 0.41/0.66  [25]~P5(x251,x252)+P2(x251,x252)+P2(x251,f2(x252))
% 0.41/0.66  [27]~P1(x271,x272)+P6(x271,x272)+~P1(x271,f2(x272))
% 0.41/0.66  [46]~P1(x461,x462)+~P1(x461,f2(x462))+~P5(f5(x461,x462),x462)
% 0.41/0.66  [47]~P1(x471,x472)+~P1(x471,f2(x472))+~P5(f5(x471,x472),x471)
% 0.41/0.66  [21]~P1(x213,x211)+P1(x211,x212)+P1(x213,x212)
% 0.41/0.66  [23]~P3(x233,x231)+P3(x231,x232)+P3(x233,x232)
% 0.41/0.66  [24]~P4(x243,x241)+P4(x241,x242)+P4(x243,x242)
% 0.41/0.66  [43]~P9(x432,x431,x433)+P2(x431,x432)+P2(x433,x432)
% 0.41/0.66  [48]P2(x481,x482)+~P9(x482,x483,x481)+P2(x481,f2(x482))
% 0.41/0.66  [49]P2(x491,x492)+~P9(x492,x491,x493)+P2(x491,f2(x492))
% 0.41/0.66  [50]~P9(x502,x503,x501)+P2(x501,f2(x502))+P2(x503,f2(x502))
% 0.41/0.66  [54]~P7(x541,x543,x542)+~P7(x541,x544,x543)+P8(x541,x542,x543,x544)
% 0.41/0.66  [55]~P7(x551,x553,x554)+~P7(x551,x552,x553)+P8(x551,x552,x553,x554)
% 0.41/0.66  [56]~P8(x561,x562,x563,x564)+P7(x561,x562,x563)+P7(x561,x564,x563)
% 0.41/0.66  [57]P7(x571,x573,x572)+P7(x571,x572,x573)+~P8(x571,x574,x572,x573)
% 0.41/0.66  [58]P7(x581,x583,x582)+P7(x581,x582,x583)+~P8(x581,x582,x583,x584)
% 0.41/0.66  [59]~P8(x591,x594,x592,x593)+P7(x591,x592,x593)+P7(x591,x592,x594)
% 0.41/0.66  [19]~P11(x192)+~P11(x191)+P1(x191,x192)+P1(x191,f2(x192))
% 0.41/0.66  [26]~P12(x262)+~P12(x261)+~P3(x261,x262)+P11(f4(x261,x262))
% 0.41/0.66  [34]~P1(x341,x342)+P10(x341,x342)+P10(x341,f2(x342))+~P1(x341,f2(x342))
% 0.41/0.66  [32]~P1(x321,x323)+P1(x321,x322)+~P1(x321,f2(x323))+P1(x323,f2(x322))
% 0.41/0.66  [33]~P1(x333,x331)+P1(x331,x332)+~P1(x333,f2(x331))+P1(x333,f2(x332))
% 0.41/0.66  [36]~P11(x362)+~P11(x361)+~P1(x361,x362)+~P1(x361,f2(x362))+P12(f5(x361,x362))
% 0.41/0.66  [53]P7(x532,x533,x531)+~P3(x533,x531)+P2(x531,x532)+P2(x533,x532)+P2(x531,f2(x532))+P2(x533,f2(x532))+P1(x532,f4(x533,x531))
% 0.41/0.66  [52]P2(x524,x523)+~P3(x524,x521)+~P4(x523,x522)+P2(x521,x522)+P2(x521,x523)+P2(x524,x522)+P2(x521,f2(x522))+P2(x521,f2(x523))+P2(x524,f2(x522))+P2(x524,f2(x523))
% 0.41/0.66  %EqnAxiom
% 0.41/0.66  
% 0.41/0.66  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.66  cnf(63,plain,
% 0.41/0.66     (~P1(x631,x631)),
% 0.41/0.66     inference(rename_variables,[],[3])).
% 0.41/0.66  cnf(71,plain,
% 0.41/0.66     (P1(a1,f2(f2(a1)))),
% 0.41/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,63,4,38,15,16,59,58,57,21])).
% 0.41/0.66  cnf(72,plain,
% 0.41/0.66     (~P1(x721,x721)),
% 0.41/0.66     inference(rename_variables,[],[3])).
% 0.41/0.66  cnf(76,plain,
% 0.41/0.66     (~P1(x761,x761)),
% 0.41/0.66     inference(rename_variables,[],[3])).
% 0.41/0.66  cnf(79,plain,
% 0.41/0.66     (~P1(x791,x791)),
% 0.41/0.66     inference(rename_variables,[],[3])).
% 0.41/0.66  cnf(88,plain,
% 0.41/0.66     (P1(f2(a1),f2(a1))+~P1(f2(f2(a1)),f2(a1))),
% 0.41/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,63,72,76,79,4,5,6,8,12,38,15,16,59,58,57,21,19,33,34,24,27,32])).
% 0.41/0.66  cnf(95,plain,
% 0.41/0.66     (P1(a1,f2(a1))),
% 0.41/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,71,88,21])).
% 0.41/0.66  cnf(102,plain,
% 0.41/0.66     (P10(a1,f2(f2(a1)))),
% 0.41/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,95,71,34])).
% 0.41/0.66  cnf(113,plain,
% 0.41/0.66     ($false),
% 0.41/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[102,6]),
% 0.41/0.66     ['proof']).
% 0.41/0.66  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.41/0.66  % Total time :0.020000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------