TSTP Solution File: GEO233+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO233+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:48 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.64s 1.90s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   22
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (   9 unt;  17 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  13   ~;  11   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   33 (  16   >;  17   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (;  21   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ between_on_line > divides_points > before_on_line > unequally_directed_lines > left_convergent_lines > left_apart_point > distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > point > line > parallel_through_point > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > reverse_line > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(distinct_points,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(intersection_point,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(parallel_through_point,type,
    parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(convergent_lines,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(point,type,
    point: $i > $o ).

tff(reverse_line,type,
    reverse_line: $i > $i ).

tff(line,type,
    line: $i > $o ).

tff(between_on_line,type,
    between_on_line: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(left_convergent_lines,type,
    left_convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(distinct_lines,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(before_on_line,type,
    before_on_line: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(divides_points,type,
    divides_points: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(left_apart_point,type,
    left_apart_point: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(unequally_directed_lines,type,
    unequally_directed_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_281,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [L] : ~ unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(reverse_line(L)),L),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

tff(f_128,axiom,
    ! [L,M,N] :
      ( unequally_directed_lines(L,M)
     => ( unequally_directed_lines(L,N)
        | unequally_directed_lines(M,N) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax',oag6) ).

tff(f_122,axiom,
    ! [L] : ~ unequally_directed_lines(L,L),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax',oag5) ).

tff(f_166,axiom,
    ! [L,M] :
      ~ ( left_convergent_lines(L,M)
        | left_convergent_lines(L,reverse_line(M)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax',oag11) ).

tff(f_156,axiom,
    ! [L,M] :
      ( ( unequally_directed_lines(L,M)
        & unequally_directed_lines(L,reverse_line(M)) )
     => ( left_convergent_lines(L,M)
        | left_convergent_lines(L,reverse_line(M)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax',oag9) ).

tff(c_118,plain,
    unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(reverse_line('#skF_1')),'#skF_1'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_281]) ).

tff(c_200,plain,
    ! [M_113,N_114,L_115] :
      ( unequally_directed_lines(M_113,N_114)
      | unequally_directed_lines(L_115,N_114)
      | ~ unequally_directed_lines(L_115,M_113) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_128]) ).

tff(c_204,plain,
    ! [N_116] :
      ( unequally_directed_lines('#skF_1',N_116)
      | unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(reverse_line('#skF_1')),N_116) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_200]) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    ! [L_23] : ~ unequally_directed_lines(L_23,L_23),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_122]) ).

tff(c_217,plain,
    unequally_directed_lines('#skF_1',reverse_line(reverse_line('#skF_1'))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_204,c_60]) ).

tff(c_80,plain,
    ! [L_36,M_37] : ~ left_convergent_lines(L_36,M_37),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_166]) ).

tff(c_74,plain,
    ! [L_32,M_33] :
      ( left_convergent_lines(L_32,reverse_line(M_33))
      | left_convergent_lines(L_32,M_33)
      | ~ unequally_directed_lines(L_32,reverse_line(M_33))
      | ~ unequally_directed_lines(L_32,M_33) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_156]) ).

tff(c_126,plain,
    ! [L_32,M_33] :
      ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(L_32,reverse_line(M_33))
      | ~ unequally_directed_lines(L_32,M_33) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_80,c_74]) ).

tff(c_224,plain,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines('#skF_1',reverse_line('#skF_1')),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_217,c_126]) ).

tff(c_226,plain,
    ! [M_120] :
      ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(reverse_line('#skF_1')),M_120)
      | unequally_directed_lines('#skF_1',reverse_line(M_120)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_204,c_126]) ).

tff(c_232,plain,
    unequally_directed_lines('#skF_1',reverse_line('#skF_1')),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_226]) ).

tff(c_237,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_224,c_232]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : GEO233+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:37:18 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.64/1.90  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.64/1.91  
% 3.64/1.91  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.86/1.93  
% 3.86/1.93  Inference rules
% 3.86/1.93  ----------------------
% 3.86/1.93  #Ref     : 0
% 3.86/1.93  #Sup     : 17
% 3.86/1.93  #Fact    : 0
% 3.86/1.93  #Define  : 0
% 3.86/1.93  #Split   : 1
% 3.86/1.93  #Chain   : 0
% 3.86/1.93  #Close   : 0
% 3.86/1.93  
% 3.86/1.93  Ordering : KBO
% 3.86/1.93  
% 3.86/1.93  Simplification rules
% 3.86/1.93  ----------------------
% 3.86/1.93  #Subsume      : 43
% 3.86/1.93  #Demod        : 0
% 3.86/1.93  #Tautology    : 0
% 3.86/1.93  #SimpNegUnit  : 17
% 3.86/1.93  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.86/1.93  
% 3.86/1.93  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.86/1.93  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.86/1.93  
% 3.86/1.93  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.86/1.93  ----------------------
% 3.86/1.94  Preprocessing        : 0.58
% 3.86/1.94  Parsing              : 0.32
% 3.86/1.94  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 3.86/1.94  Main loop            : 0.29
% 3.86/1.94  Inferencing          : 0.10
% 3.86/1.94  Reduction            : 0.07
% 3.86/1.94  Demodulation         : 0.05
% 3.86/1.94  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 3.86/1.94  Subsumption          : 0.08
% 3.86/1.94  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.86/1.94  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.86/1.94  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.86/1.94  Total                : 0.91
% 3.86/1.94  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.86/1.94  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.86/1.94  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.86/1.94  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------