TSTP Solution File: GEO232+3 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : GEO232+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ct9JIVZs0Y true
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:57:54 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.54s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 9 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 21 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 59 ( 8 ~; 4 |; 0 &; 45 @)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 7 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 ^; 17 !; 0 ?; 17 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(unequally_directed_lines_type,type,
unequally_directed_lines: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(equally_directed_lines_type,type,
equally_directed_lines: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(unequally_directed_opposite_lines_type,type,
unequally_directed_opposite_lines: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__type,type,
sk_: $i ).
thf(reverse_line_type,type,
reverse_line: $i > $i ).
thf(ax8_basics,axiom,
! [L: $i,M: $i] :
( ( unequally_directed_lines @ L @ ( reverse_line @ M ) )
| ( unequally_directed_lines @ L @ M ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl44,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( unequally_directed_lines @ X0 @ ( reverse_line @ X1 ) )
| ( unequally_directed_lines @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax8_basics]) ).
thf(a1_defns,axiom,
! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( unequally_directed_opposite_lines @ X @ Y )
<=> ( unequally_directed_lines @ X @ ( reverse_line @ Y ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( unequally_directed_opposite_lines @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( unequally_directed_lines @ X0 @ ( reverse_line @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[a1_defns]) ).
thf(con,conjecture,
! [L: $i] : ( unequally_directed_opposite_lines @ L @ L ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [L: $i] : ( unequally_directed_opposite_lines @ L @ L ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[con]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl67,plain,
~ ( unequally_directed_opposite_lines @ sk_ @ sk_ ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl99,plain,
~ ( unequally_directed_lines @ sk_ @ ( reverse_line @ sk_ ) ),
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl67]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl135,plain,
unequally_directed_lines @ sk_ @ sk_,
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl44,zip_derived_cl99]) ).
thf(ax5_basics,axiom,
! [L: $i] : ( equally_directed_lines @ L @ L ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl37,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ( equally_directed_lines @ X0 @ X0 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax5_basics]) ).
thf(a4_defns,axiom,
! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( equally_directed_lines @ X @ Y )
<=> ~ ( unequally_directed_lines @ X @ Y ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl6,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( unequally_directed_lines @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( equally_directed_lines @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[a4_defns]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl110,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
~ ( unequally_directed_lines @ X0 @ X0 ),
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl37,zip_derived_cl6]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl139,plain,
$false,
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl135,zip_derived_cl110]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : GEO232+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ct9JIVZs0Y true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 20:12:37 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.50/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.50/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.50/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.54/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.54/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.54/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.54/0.74 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.54/0.74 % BCE start: 68
% 0.54/0.74 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.54/0.74 % PE start: 68
% 0.54/0.74 logic: neq
% 0.54/0.74 % PE eliminated: 29
% 0.54/0.74 % done 18 iterations in 0.017s
% 0.54/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.54/0.74 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.54/0.74
% 0.54/0.74
% 0.54/0.74 % Terminating...
% 1.50/0.84 % Runner terminated.
% 1.50/0.86 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------