TSTP Solution File: GEO232+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO232+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.87s 2.30s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.87s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 6 unt; 4 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_67,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dnjkemp6/input.p',i_0_67) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dnjkemp6/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_63,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dnjkemp6/input.p',i_0_63) ).
cnf(i_0_55,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dnjkemp6/input.p',i_0_55) ).
cnf(c_0_72,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_opposite_lines(esk1_0,esk1_0),
i_0_67 ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
( unequally_directed_opposite_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_74,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk1_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_73]) ).
cnf(c_0_75,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
i_0_63 ).
cnf(c_0_76,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X3,X1) ),
i_0_55 ).
cnf(c_0_77,plain,
unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk1_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75]) ).
cnf(c_0_78,plain,
unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_77]) ).
cnf(c_0_79,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_78])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO232+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 22:47:36 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.87/2.30 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 6.87/2.30 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 6.87/2.30 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 6.87/2.30
% 6.87/2.30 # Proof found!
% 6.87/2.30 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.87/2.30 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.87/2.30 # Proof object total steps : 12
% 6.87/2.30 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 6.87/2.30 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 6.87/2.30 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 6.87/2.30 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 6.87/2.30 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 6.87/2.30 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 6.87/2.30 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 6.87/2.30 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 6.87/2.30 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 6.87/2.30 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.87/2.30 # Parsed axioms : 67
% 6.87/2.30 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 6.87/2.30 # Initial clauses : 67
% 6.87/2.30 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 6.87/2.30 # Initial clauses in saturation : 67
% 6.87/2.30 # Processed clauses : 70
% 6.87/2.30 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 6.87/2.30 # ...subsumed : 18
% 6.87/2.30 # ...remaining for further processing : 52
% 6.87/2.30 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 6.87/2.30 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.87/2.30 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 6.87/2.30 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 6.87/2.30 # Generated clauses : 48
% 6.87/2.30 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 31
% 6.87/2.30 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 6
% 6.87/2.30 # Paramodulations : 34
% 6.87/2.30 # Factorizations : 14
% 6.87/2.30 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 6.87/2.30 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.87/2.30 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 6.87/2.30 # Current number of processed clauses : 47
% 6.87/2.30 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 6.87/2.30 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.87/2.30 # Negative unit clauses : 11
% 6.87/2.30 # Non-unit-clauses : 33
% 6.87/2.30 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26
% 6.87/2.30 # ...number of literals in the above : 56
% 6.87/2.30 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.87/2.30 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 6.87/2.30 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 316
% 6.87/2.30 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 227
% 6.87/2.30 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 6.87/2.30 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 98
% 6.87/2.30 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.87/2.30 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 6.87/2.30 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 6.87/2.30 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.87/2.30 # Condensation successes : 0
% 6.87/2.30 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1676
% 6.87/2.30
% 6.87/2.30 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.87/2.30 # User time : 0.015 s
% 6.87/2.30 # System time : 0.002 s
% 6.87/2.30 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 6.87/2.30 # ...preprocessing : 0.016 s
% 6.87/2.30 # ...main loop : 0.002 s
% 6.87/2.30 # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 6.87/2.30
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------