TSTP Solution File: GEO232+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GEO232+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 4.30s 2.13s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   7 unt;   3 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_42,plain,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
    | unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
    | ~ line(X2)
    | ~ line(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hsc3e2c9/input.p',i_0_42) ).

cnf(i_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    line(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hsc3e2c9/input.p',i_0_18) ).

cnf(i_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk1_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hsc3e2c9/input.p',i_0_17) ).

cnf(i_0_36,plain,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hsc3e2c9/input.p',i_0_36) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
    | unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
    | ~ line(X2)
    | ~ line(X1) ),
    i_0_42 ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    line(esk1_0),
    i_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(esk1_0))
    | unequally_directed_lines(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ line(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk1_0)),
    i_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X1),
    i_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_48]),c_0_50]),c_0_51]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : GEO232+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 12:15:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.44  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.44  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.44  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 4.30/2.13  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 4.30/2.13  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 4.30/2.13  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 4.30/2.13  
% 4.30/2.13  # Proof found!
% 4.30/2.13  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.30/2.13  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.30/2.13  # Proof object total steps             : 10
% 4.30/2.13  # Proof object clause steps            : 6
% 4.30/2.13  # Proof object formula steps           : 4
% 4.30/2.13  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 4.30/2.13  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
% 4.30/2.13  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
% 4.30/2.13  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 4.30/2.13  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 4.30/2.13  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 4.30/2.13  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 4.30/2.13  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.30/2.13  # Parsed axioms                        : 60
% 4.30/2.13  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # Initial clauses                      : 60
% 4.30/2.13  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 60
% 4.30/2.13  # Processed clauses                    : 61
% 4.30/2.13  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # ...subsumed                          : 22
% 4.30/2.13  # ...remaining for further processing  : 39
% 4.30/2.13  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 4.30/2.13  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # Generated clauses                    : 22
% 4.30/2.13  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 10
% 4.30/2.13  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 9
% 4.30/2.13  # Paramodulations                      : 22
% 4.30/2.13  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # Current number of processed clauses  : 36
% 4.30/2.13  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 4.30/2.13  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 4.30/2.13  #    Negative unit clauses             : 12
% 4.30/2.13  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 23
% 4.30/2.13  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 4.30/2.13  # ...number of literals in the above   : 23
% 4.30/2.13  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 4.30/2.13  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 121
% 4.30/2.13  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 95
% 4.30/2.13  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 17
% 4.30/2.13  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 90
% 4.30/2.13  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 4.30/2.13  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1468
% 4.30/2.13  
% 4.30/2.13  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.30/2.13  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 4.30/2.13  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 4.30/2.13  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 4.30/2.13  # ...preprocessing         : 0.017 s
% 4.30/2.13  # ...main loop             : 0.002 s
% 4.30/2.13  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 4.30/2.13  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------