TSTP Solution File: GEO232+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : GEO232+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:34:34 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 11 ~; 7 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn; 9 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X2] :
( line(X2)
=> unequally_directed_lines(X2,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.givU7up2tz/E---3.1_8404.p',con) ).
fof(oag5,axiom,
! [X2] : ~ unequally_directed_lines(X2,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.givU7up2tz/E---3.1_8404.p',oag5) ).
fof(oag8,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( ( line(X2)
& line(X3) )
=> ( unequally_directed_lines(X2,X3)
| unequally_directed_lines(X2,reverse_line(X3)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.givU7up2tz/E---3.1_8404.p',oag8) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X2] :
( line(X2)
=> unequally_directed_lines(X2,reverse_line(X2)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X2] : ~ unequally_directed_lines(X2,X2),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[oag5]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( line(esk1_0)
& ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk1_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X15,X16] :
( ~ line(X15)
| ~ line(X16)
| unequally_directed_lines(X15,X16)
| unequally_directed_lines(X15,reverse_line(X16)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[oag8])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X8] : ~ unequally_directed_lines(X8,X8),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk1_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ line(X1)
| ~ line(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
line(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : GEO232+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 06:47:04 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.40 Running first-order model finding
% 0.14/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.givU7up2tz/E---3.1_8404.p
% 0.14/0.41 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.14/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # new_bool_1 with pid 8483 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.14/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.41 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.41 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr with 181s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 8486 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Result found by SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.14/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.41 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.41 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr with 181s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.41 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.41 # Parsed axioms : 32
% 0.14/0.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 26
% 0.14/0.41 # Initial clauses : 10
% 0.14/0.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.14/0.41 # Processed clauses : 15
% 0.14/0.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.14/0.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.14/0.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.14/0.41 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.14/0.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.14/0.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.14/0.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.14/0.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.14/0.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 11
% 0.14/0.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.14/0.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19
% 0.14/0.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.14/0.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.14/0.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.14/0.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Condensation attempts : 15
% 0.14/0.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 952
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.41 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.41 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.41 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.41 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.14/0.41 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------