TSTP Solution File: GEO231+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GEO231+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:23:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (  10 unt;   3 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   29 (   0 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(skc5,skc4),
    file('GEO231+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    unequally_directed_lines(skc3,reverse_line(skc4)),
    file('GEO231+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,u),
    file('GEO231+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ~ left_convergent_lines(u,v),
    file('GEO231+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(skc5,reverse_line(skc3)),
    file('GEO231+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(27,axiom,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,v)
    | unequally_directed_lines(v,w)
    | unequally_directed_lines(u,w) ),
    file('GEO231+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(55,axiom,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,v)
    | ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,reverse_line(v))
    | left_convergent_lines(u,v)
    | left_convergent_lines(u,reverse_line(v)) ),
    file('GEO231+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(62,plain,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,v)
    | ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,reverse_line(v)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[55,7]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:55.2,55.3,7.0,7.0')] ).

cnf(65,plain,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(skc3,skc4),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,62]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,62.1')] ).

cnf(67,plain,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(skc3,u)
    | unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(skc4),u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,27]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,27.0')] ).

cnf(72,plain,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,skc5)
    | unequally_directed_lines(u,skc4) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[27,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:27.2,1.0')] ).

cnf(80,plain,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,skc5)
    | unequally_directed_lines(u,reverse_line(skc3)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[27,8]),
    [iquote('0:Res:27.2,8.0')] ).

cnf(90,plain,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(skc3,skc5),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[72,65]),
    [iquote('0:Res:72.1,65.0')] ).

cnf(113,plain,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,skc5)
    | ~ unequally_directed_lines(u,skc3) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[80,62]),
    [iquote('0:Res:80.1,62.1')] ).

cnf(120,plain,
    ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(skc4),skc5)
    | unequally_directed_lines(skc3,skc3) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[67,113]),
    [iquote('0:Res:67.1,113.1')] ).

cnf(121,plain,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line(skc4),skc5),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[120,5]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:120.1,5.0')] ).

cnf(122,plain,
    unequally_directed_lines(skc3,skc5),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[67,121]),
    [iquote('0:Res:67.1,121.0')] ).

cnf(123,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[122,90]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:122.0,90.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.19  % Problem  : GEO231+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.12/0.19  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.41  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.41  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.41  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.41  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.41  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 01:32:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.52  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.52  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.52  SPASS derived 50 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 76 clauses.
% 0.20/0.52  SPASS allocated 97772 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.52  SPASS spent	0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.52  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.20/0.52  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.52  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.52  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.52  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 18 :
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52  Formulae used in the proof : con oag5 oag11 oag6 oag9
% 0.20/0.52  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------