TSTP Solution File: GEO231+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO231+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:19:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 3.41s 3.64s
% Output : Refutation 3.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GEO231+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 01:36:47 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.35 Sat Jun 18 01:36:47 2022
% 0.19/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 26403.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.19/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.19/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|unequally_directed_lines(A,C)|unequally_directed_lines(B,C).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(C))|unequally_directed_lines(B,reverse_line(C)).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -left_apart_point(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -left_convergent_lines(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,36,37] {-} -distinct_points(A,B)| -left_apart_point(A,C).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,36] {-} -left_apart_point(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,36] {-} -left_apart_point(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(B,C)|distinct_lines(B,C).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,37] {-} -left_convergent_lines(A,B)|unequally_directed_lines(B,C).
% 0.19/0.36 36 back subsumes 17.
% 0.19/0.36 36 back subsumes 16.
% 0.19/0.36 36 back subsumes 15.
% 0.19/0.36 36 back subsumes 14.
% 0.19/0.36 36 back subsumes 12.
% 0.19/0.36 36 back subsumes 11.
% 0.19/0.36 36 back subsumes 3.
% 0.19/0.36 36 back subsumes 2.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.60/0.80 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.60/0.80 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.60/0.80 number of clauses in intial UL: 51
% 0.60/0.80 number of clauses initially in problem: 52
% 0.60/0.80 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 98
% 0.60/0.80 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.60/0.80 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.60/0.80 absolute distinct symbol count: 19
% 0.60/0.80 distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.60/0.80 distinct function count: 4
% 0.60/0.80 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 =========== start of search ===========
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 -------- PROOF --------
% 3.41/3.64 % SZS status Theorem
% 3.41/3.64 % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 3.25 sec ----> 801 [hyper,145,35,325,unit_del,52,37,37] {-} $F.
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 Length of proof is 8. Level of proof is 5.
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 3.41/3.64 % SZS status Theorem
% 3.41/3.64 % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 30 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines(A,A).
% 3.41/3.64 31 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,C)|unequally_directed_lines(B,C).
% 3.41/3.64 35 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines(A,B)| -unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line(B))|left_convergent_lines(A,B)|left_convergent_lines(A,reverse_line(B)).
% 3.41/3.64 37 [] {+} -left_convergent_lines(A,B).
% 3.41/3.64 52 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines($c3,reverse_line($c2)).
% 3.41/3.64 53 [] {+} -unequally_directed_lines($c3,$c1).
% 3.41/3.64 61 [] {-} unequally_directed_lines($c2,reverse_line($c1)).
% 3.41/3.64 62 [hyper,61,31] {-} unequally_directed_lines($c2,A)|unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line($c1),A).
% 3.41/3.64 66 [hyper,62,31] {-} unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line($c1),A)|unequally_directed_lines($c2,B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,B).
% 3.41/3.64 67 [hyper,62,30] {-} unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line($c1),$c2).
% 3.41/3.64 69 [hyper,62,31] {-} unequally_directed_lines($c2,A)|unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line($c1),B)|unequally_directed_lines(A,B).
% 3.41/3.64 103 [hyper,66,35,61,unit_del,37,37] {-} unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line($c1),A)|unequally_directed_lines(A,$c1).
% 3.41/3.64 145 [hyper,69,35,67,unit_del,37,37] {-} unequally_directed_lines($c2,A)|unequally_directed_lines(A,reverse_line($c2)).
% 3.41/3.64 269 [hyper,103,53] {-} unequally_directed_lines(reverse_line($c1),$c3).
% 3.41/3.64 325 [hyper,269,35,66,unit_del,37,37,30] {-} unequally_directed_lines($c2,reverse_line($c3)).
% 3.41/3.64 801 [hyper,145,35,325,unit_del,52,37,37] {-} $F.
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.41/3.64 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 ============ end of search ============
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 3.41/3.64 false clauses given 90
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 FALSE TRUE
% 3.41/3.64 7 26 0
% 3.41/3.64 8 67 0
% 3.41/3.64 9 102 0
% 3.41/3.64 10 79 0
% 3.41/3.64 11 94 0
% 3.41/3.64 12 96 0
% 3.41/3.64 13 44 0
% 3.41/3.64 14 53 0
% 3.41/3.64 15 22 0
% 3.41/3.64 16 8 0
% 3.41/3.64 17 10 0
% 3.41/3.64 tot: 601 0 (0.0% true)
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 3.41/3.64
% 3.41/3.64 Process 26403 finished Sat Jun 18 01:36:50 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------