TSTP Solution File: GEO229+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : GEO229+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 05:16:17 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.35s
% Output : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 21 ( 13 ~; 0 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 6 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f140,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f104,f103]) ).
fof(f103,plain,
~ unequally_directed_lines(sK1,reverse_line(sK2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).
fof(f100,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(sK1,reverse_line(sK2))
& ~ unequally_directed_lines(sK1,reverse_line(sK2)) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2])],[f61,f99]) ).
fof(f99,plain,
( ? [X0,X1] :
( unequally_directed_lines(X0,reverse_line(X1))
& ~ unequally_directed_lines(X0,reverse_line(X1)) )
=> ( unequally_directed_lines(sK1,reverse_line(sK2))
& ~ unequally_directed_lines(sK1,reverse_line(sK2)) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f61,plain,
? [X0,X1] :
( unequally_directed_lines(X0,reverse_line(X1))
& ~ unequally_directed_lines(X0,reverse_line(X1)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
~ ! [X0,X1] :
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X0,reverse_line(X1))
=> ~ unequally_directed_lines(X0,reverse_line(X1)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f33]) ).
fof(f33,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
=> ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f32]) ).
fof(f32,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
=> ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(f104,plain,
unequally_directed_lines(sK1,reverse_line(sK2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : GEO229+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 3 22:05:53 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 % (2617)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.12/0.35 % (2622)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.35 % (2622)First to succeed.
% 0.12/0.35 % (2622)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2617"
% 0.12/0.35 % (2622)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.35 % (2622)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.35 % (2622)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.12/0.35 % (2622)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 % (2622)Memory used [KB]: 827
% 0.12/0.35 % (2622)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.35 % (2622)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.12/0.35 % (2617)Success in time 0.012 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------