TSTP Solution File: GEO229+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : GEO229+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:22:35 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 5.74s 1.48s
% Output : Proof 8.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GEO229+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 23:38:44 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.63 ________ _____
% 0.21/0.63 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.21/0.63 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.21/0.63 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.21/0.63 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.21/0.63 (2023-06-19)
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.21/0.63 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.21/0.63 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.21/0.63 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.21/0.64 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.21/0.66 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.21/0.66 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.21/0.66 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.21/0.66 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.21/0.66 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.21/0.66 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.21/0.66 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 2.84/1.14 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.84/1.14 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.55/1.17 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.55/1.17 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.55/1.17 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 3.55/1.17 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.55/1.17 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 5.15/1.43 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.15/1.45 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.74/1.48 Prover 2: proved (830ms)
% 5.74/1.48
% 5.74/1.48 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.74/1.48
% 5.74/1.49 Prover 5: proved (827ms)
% 5.74/1.49
% 5.74/1.49 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.74/1.49
% 5.74/1.49 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 5.74/1.50 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 5.74/1.51 Prover 0: stopped
% 5.74/1.52 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 6.46/1.59 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.60/1.60 Prover 3: stopped
% 6.60/1.61 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 6.60/1.61 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 6.60/1.61 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 6.60/1.61 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 6.60/1.62 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.60/1.62 Prover 6: stopped
% 6.83/1.63 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 7.32/1.72 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 7.32/1.74 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 7.32/1.74 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.32/1.75 Prover 1: Found proof (size 1)
% 7.32/1.75 Prover 1: proved (1100ms)
% 7.87/1.77 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.87/1.80 Prover 13: stopped
% 7.87/1.80 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.87/1.81 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.87/1.81 Prover 10: stopped
% 7.87/1.81 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.87/1.81 Prover 7: stopped
% 8.58/1.87 Prover 11: stopped
% 8.58/1.88 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.58/1.89 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.58/1.89 Prover 8: stopped
% 8.88/1.97 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.88/1.97 Prover 4: stopped
% 8.88/1.97
% 8.88/1.97 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.88/1.97
% 8.88/1.98 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 8.88/1.98 Assumptions after simplification:
% 8.88/1.98 ---------------------------------
% 8.88/1.98
% 8.88/1.98 (con)
% 8.88/1.98 $false
% 8.88/1.98
% 8.88/1.98 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 8.88/1.98 --------------------------------------------
% 8.88/1.98 apt_def, bet_def, bf_def, con_def, div_def, oag1, oag10, oag11, oag2, oag3,
% 8.88/1.99 oag4, oag5, oag6, oag7, oag8, oag9, oagco1, oagco10, oagco2, oagco3, oagco4,
% 8.88/1.99 oagco5, oagco6, oagco7, oagco8, oagco9, oagsub1, oagsub2, oagsub3, oaguc1,
% 8.88/1.99 oaguc2
% 8.88/1.99
% 8.88/1.99 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 8.88/1.99 ---------------------------------
% 8.88/1.99
% 8.88/1.99 Begin of proof
% 8.88/1.99 |
% 8.88/1.99 | CLOSE: (con) is inconsistent.
% 8.88/1.99 |
% 8.88/1.99 End of proof
% 8.88/1.99 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 8.88/1.99
% 8.88/1.99 1355ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------