TSTP Solution File: GEO228+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO228+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:41 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.21s 2.08s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 5 unt; 6 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 31 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_44,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pubn8fdm/input.p',i_0_44) ).
cnf(i_0_32,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pubn8fdm/input.p',i_0_32) ).
cnf(i_0_21,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pubn8fdm/input.p',i_0_21) ).
cnf(i_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pubn8fdm/input.p',i_0_18) ).
cnf(i_0_22,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pubn8fdm/input.p',i_0_22) ).
cnf(i_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pubn8fdm/input.p',i_0_19) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( left_convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| left_convergent_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
i_0_44 ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
~ left_convergent_lines(X1,X2),
i_0_32 ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)) ),
i_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
i_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_52]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]),c_0_59])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09 % Problem : GEO228+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.02/0.09 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.09/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.28 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 08:34:18 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.12/0.36 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.12/0.36 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.12/0.36 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 4.21/2.08 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 4.21/2.08 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 4.21/2.08 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 4.21/2.08
% 4.21/2.08 # Proof found!
% 4.21/2.08 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.21/2.08 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.21/2.08 # Proof object total steps : 16
% 4.21/2.08 # Proof object clause steps : 10
% 4.21/2.08 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 4.21/2.08 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 4.21/2.08 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 4.21/2.08 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 4.21/2.08 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 4.21/2.08 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 4.21/2.08 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 4.21/2.08 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 4.21/2.08 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.21/2.08 # Parsed axioms : 61
% 4.21/2.08 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 4.21/2.08 # Initial clauses : 61
% 4.21/2.08 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 4.21/2.08 # Initial clauses in saturation : 61
% 4.21/2.08 # Processed clauses : 63
% 4.21/2.08 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 4.21/2.08 # ...subsumed : 26
% 4.21/2.08 # ...remaining for further processing : 37
% 4.21/2.08 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 4.21/2.08 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.21/2.08 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 4.21/2.08 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 4.21/2.08 # Generated clauses : 27
% 4.21/2.08 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 13
% 4.21/2.08 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 9
% 4.21/2.08 # Paramodulations : 27
% 4.21/2.08 # Factorizations : 0
% 4.21/2.08 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 4.21/2.08 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 4.21/2.08 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 4.21/2.08 # Current number of processed clauses : 33
% 4.21/2.08 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 4.21/2.08 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 4.21/2.08 # Negative unit clauses : 11
% 4.21/2.08 # Non-unit-clauses : 20
% 4.21/2.08 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7
% 4.21/2.08 # ...number of literals in the above : 25
% 4.21/2.08 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.21/2.08 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 4.21/2.08 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 130
% 4.21/2.08 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 94
% 4.21/2.08 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 16
% 4.21/2.08 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 81
% 4.21/2.08 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 4.21/2.08 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 4.21/2.08 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 4.21/2.08 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.21/2.08 # Condensation successes : 0
% 4.21/2.08 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1490
% 4.21/2.08
% 4.21/2.08 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.21/2.08 # User time : 0.010 s
% 4.21/2.08 # System time : 0.001 s
% 4.21/2.08 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 4.21/2.08 # ...preprocessing : 0.010 s
% 4.21/2.08 # ...main loop : 0.001 s
% 4.21/2.08 # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 4.21/2.08
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------