TSTP Solution File: GEO227+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : GEO227+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n005.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 16091.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Apr 1 13:39:15 EDT 2016
% Result : Theorem 0.06s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 56 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 64 ( 28 ~; 16 |; 16 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(5,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( line(X1)
& line(X2) )
=> ( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp08ec5a/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',oag8) ).
fof(6,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( line(X1)
& line(X2) )
=> ~ ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
& ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp08ec5a/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',con) ).
fof(7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( ( line(X1)
& line(X2) )
=> ~ ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
& ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[6]) ).
fof(9,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( ( line(X1)
& line(X2) )
=> ~ ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
& ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[7,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(25,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ~ line(X1)
| ~ line(X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
fof(26,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ line(X3)
| ~ line(X4)
| unequally_directed_lines(X3,X4)
| unequally_directed_lines(X3,reverse_line(X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[25]) ).
cnf(27,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ line(X2)
| ~ line(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
fof(28,negated_conjecture,
? [X1,X2] :
( line(X1)
& line(X2)
& ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
& ~ unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
fof(29,negated_conjecture,
? [X3,X4] :
( line(X3)
& line(X4)
& ~ unequally_directed_lines(X3,X4)
& ~ unequally_directed_lines(X3,reverse_line(X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[28]) ).
fof(30,negated_conjecture,
( line(esk1_0)
& line(esk2_0)
& ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[29]) ).
cnf(31,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[30]) ).
cnf(32,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[30]) ).
cnf(33,negated_conjecture,
line(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[30]) ).
cnf(34,negated_conjecture,
line(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[30]) ).
cnf(37,negated_conjecture,
( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| ~ line(esk2_0)
| ~ line(esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[31,27,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(38,negated_conjecture,
( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| $false
| ~ line(esk1_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[37,33,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(39,negated_conjecture,
( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| $false
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[38,34,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(40,negated_conjecture,
unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[39,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(41,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[40,32,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(42,negated_conjecture,
$false,
41,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GEO227+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n005.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 16091.75MB
% 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Fri Apr 1 11:09:23 CDT 2016
% 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime :
% 0.03/0.27 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.27 --creating new selector for [GEO007+0.ax]
% 0.06/0.34 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp08ec5a/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.06/0.34 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp08ec5a/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.06/0.34 -prover status Theorem
% 0.06/0.34 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.06/0.34 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.34 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.34 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.06/0.34 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.06/0.34 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.06/0.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.06/0.34 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------