TSTP Solution File: GEO227+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO227+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:40 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.38s 2.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 9 unt; 3 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_44,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ line(X2)
| ~ line(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rhgc4dkz/input.p',i_0_44) ).
cnf(i_0_19,negated_conjecture,
line(esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rhgc4dkz/input.p',i_0_19) ).
cnf(i_0_20,negated_conjecture,
line(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rhgc4dkz/input.p',i_0_20) ).
cnf(i_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rhgc4dkz/input.p',i_0_17) ).
cnf(i_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rhgc4dkz/input.p',i_0_18) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
| ~ line(X2)
| ~ line(X1) ),
i_0_44 ).
cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
line(esk2_0),
i_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
( unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(esk2_0))
| unequally_directed_lines(X1,esk2_0)
| ~ line(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
line(esk1_0),
i_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)),
i_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]),c_0_54]),c_0_55]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : GEO227+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 18:53:05 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.48 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.38/2.48 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 8.38/2.48 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.38/2.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 8.38/2.48
% 8.38/2.48 # Proof found!
% 8.38/2.48 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.38/2.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.38/2.48 # Proof object total steps : 12
% 8.38/2.48 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 8.38/2.48 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 8.38/2.48 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 8.38/2.48 # Proof object clause conjectures : 6
% 8.38/2.48 # Proof object formula conjectures : 4
% 8.38/2.48 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 8.38/2.48 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 8.38/2.48 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 8.38/2.48 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 8.38/2.48 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.38/2.48 # Parsed axioms : 62
% 8.38/2.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.38/2.48 # Initial clauses : 62
% 8.38/2.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.38/2.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 62
% 8.38/2.48 # Processed clauses : 63
% 8.38/2.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 8.38/2.48 # ...subsumed : 23
% 8.38/2.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 40
% 8.38/2.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 8.38/2.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.38/2.48 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 8.38/2.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 8.38/2.48 # Generated clauses : 34
% 8.38/2.48 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 23
% 8.38/2.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 9
% 8.38/2.48 # Paramodulations : 20
% 8.38/2.48 # Factorizations : 14
% 8.38/2.48 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 8.38/2.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.38/2.48 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 8.38/2.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 37
% 8.38/2.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 8.38/2.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.38/2.48 # Negative unit clauses : 13
% 8.38/2.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 22
% 8.38/2.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 18
% 8.38/2.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 46
% 8.38/2.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.38/2.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 8.38/2.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 118
% 8.38/2.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 94
% 8.38/2.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 17
% 8.38/2.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 82
% 8.38/2.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.38/2.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 8.38/2.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 8.38/2.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.38/2.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.38/2.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1526
% 8.38/2.48
% 8.38/2.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.38/2.48 # User time : 0.013 s
% 8.38/2.48 # System time : 0.008 s
% 8.38/2.48 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 8.38/2.48 # ...preprocessing : 0.019 s
% 8.38/2.48 # ...main loop : 0.002 s
% 8.38/2.48 # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 8.38/2.48
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------