TSTP Solution File: GEO227+1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : GEO227+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:47:17 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (   5 unt;  18 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   32 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   36 (  16   ~;   9   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   33 (  16   >;  17   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn;   8   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    left_apart_point: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    reverse_line: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    unequally_directed_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    divides_points: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    before_on_line: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    between_on_line: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    line: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    left_convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    point: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_38,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_39,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ( line(X2)
        & line(X3) )
     => ~ ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X2,X3)
          & ~ unequally_directed_lines(X2,reverse_line(X3)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(oag8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ( line(X2)
        & line(X3) )
     => ( unequally_directed_lines(X2,X3)
        | unequally_directed_lines(X2,reverse_line(X3)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO007+0.ax',oag8) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2,X3] :
        ( ( line(X2)
          & line(X3) )
       => ~ ( ~ unequally_directed_lines(X2,X3)
            & ~ unequally_directed_lines(X2,reverse_line(X3)) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])]) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X36,X37] :
      ( ~ line(X36)
      | ~ line(X37)
      | unequally_directed_lines(X36,X37)
      | unequally_directed_lines(X36,reverse_line(X37)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[oag8])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( line(esk1_0)
    & line(esk2_0)
    & ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(X1,X2)
    | unequally_directed_lines(X1,reverse_line(X2))
    | ~ line(X1)
    | ~ line(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    line(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(X1))
    | unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,X1)
    | ~ line(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    line(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,reverse_line(esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unequally_directed_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : GEO227+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v6.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Wed Aug 30 00:00:03 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.56  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.58  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.58  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58  % Proof found
% 0.19/0.58  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.58  % Total time : 0.012000 s
% 0.19/0.58  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.58  % Total time : 0.015000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------