TSTP Solution File: GEO225+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO225+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.92s 2.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 3 unt; 3 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 0 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dbzhf_g7/input.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(i_0_3,plain,
( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dbzhf_g7/input.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_20,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dbzhf_g7/input.p',i_0_20) ).
cnf(i_0_21,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dbzhf_g7/input.p',i_0_21) ).
cnf(i_0_28,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dbzhf_g7/input.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ~ incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1) ),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,X1))
| ~ distinct_points(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO225+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 10:37:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.92/2.56 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 8.92/2.56 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.92/2.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 8.92/2.56
% 8.92/2.56 # Proof found!
% 8.92/2.56 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.92/2.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.92/2.56 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 8.92/2.56 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 8.92/2.56 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 8.92/2.56 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 8.92/2.56 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 8.92/2.56 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 8.92/2.56 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 8.92/2.56 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 8.92/2.56 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 8.92/2.56 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 8.92/2.56 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.92/2.56 # Parsed axioms : 47
% 8.92/2.56 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # Initial clauses : 47
% 8.92/2.56 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # Initial clauses in saturation : 47
% 8.92/2.56 # Processed clauses : 68
% 8.92/2.56 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # ...subsumed : 9
% 8.92/2.56 # ...remaining for further processing : 59
% 8.92/2.56 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # Generated clauses : 119
% 8.92/2.56 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 98
% 8.92/2.56 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 8.92/2.56 # Paramodulations : 95
% 8.92/2.56 # Factorizations : 24
% 8.92/2.56 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # Current number of processed clauses : 59
% 8.92/2.56 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 8.92/2.56 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.92/2.56 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 8.92/2.56 # Non-unit-clauses : 45
% 8.92/2.56 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 75
% 8.92/2.56 # ...number of literals in the above : 336
% 8.92/2.56 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 396
% 8.92/2.56 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 219
% 8.92/2.56 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 8.92/2.56 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 8.92/2.56 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.92/2.56 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2192
% 8.92/2.56
% 8.92/2.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.92/2.56 # User time : 0.010 s
% 8.92/2.56 # System time : 0.002 s
% 8.92/2.56 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 8.92/2.56 # ...preprocessing : 0.010 s
% 8.92/2.56 # ...main loop : 0.002 s
% 8.92/2.56 # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 8.92/2.56
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------