TSTP Solution File: GEO225+2 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : GEO225+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:46 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.73s 1.94s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 4 unt; 12 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 30 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 29 ( 11 ~; 10 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 18 ( 10 >; 8 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 (; 18 !; 1 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > point > line > parallel_through_point > orthogonal_through_point > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_1
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(distinct_points,type,
distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(intersection_point,type,
intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(parallel_through_point,type,
parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(convergent_lines,type,
convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(orthogonal_through_point,type,
orthogonal_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(point,type,
point: $i > $o ).
tff(line,type,
line: $i > $o ).
tff('#skF_2',type,
'#skF_2': $i ).
tff('#skF_1',type,
'#skF_1': $i ).
tff(distinct_lines,type,
distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(f_57,axiom,
! [X] : ~ distinct_points(X,X),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',apart1) ).
tff(f_202,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A,B] :
( ( point(A)
& point(B)
& distinct_points(A,B) )
=> ? [X] :
( line(X)
=> ( ~ apart_point_and_line(A,X)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(B,X) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
tff(f_90,axiom,
! [X,Y,Z] :
( distinct_points(X,Y)
=> ( apart_point_and_line(Z,line_connecting(X,Y))
=> ( distinct_points(Z,X)
& distinct_points(Z,Y) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',con1) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
! [X_1] : ~ distinct_points(X_1,X_1),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_57]) ).
tff(c_42,plain,
distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_202]) ).
tff(c_40,plain,
! [X_40] :
( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',X_40)
| apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',X_40) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_202]) ).
tff(c_497,plain,
! [Z_96,Y_97,X_98] :
( distinct_points(Z_96,Y_97)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(Z_96,line_connecting(X_98,Y_97))
| ~ distinct_points(X_98,Y_97) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_90]) ).
tff(c_528,plain,
! [Y_104,X_105] :
( distinct_points('#skF_2',Y_104)
| ~ distinct_points(X_105,Y_104)
| apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting(X_105,Y_104)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_497]) ).
tff(c_16,plain,
! [Z_15,X_13,Y_14] :
( distinct_points(Z_15,X_13)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(Z_15,line_connecting(X_13,Y_14))
| ~ distinct_points(X_13,Y_14) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_90]) ).
tff(c_543,plain,
! [X_106,Y_107] :
( distinct_points('#skF_1',X_106)
| distinct_points('#skF_2',Y_107)
| ~ distinct_points(X_106,Y_107) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_528,c_16]) ).
tff(c_591,plain,
( distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_1')
| distinct_points('#skF_2','#skF_2') ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_543]) ).
tff(c_642,plain,
$false,
inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_2,c_591]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : GEO225+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Aug 4 00:32:24 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 3.73/1.94 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.73/1.95
% 3.73/1.95 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.73/1.97
% 3.73/1.97 Inference rules
% 3.73/1.97 ----------------------
% 3.73/1.97 #Ref : 0
% 3.73/1.97 #Sup : 91
% 3.73/1.97 #Fact : 22
% 3.73/1.97 #Define : 0
% 3.73/1.97 #Split : 1
% 3.73/1.97 #Chain : 0
% 3.73/1.98 #Close : 0
% 3.73/1.98
% 3.73/1.98 Ordering : KBO
% 3.73/1.98
% 3.73/1.98 Simplification rules
% 3.73/1.98 ----------------------
% 3.73/1.98 #Subsume : 26
% 3.73/1.98 #Demod : 43
% 3.73/1.98 #Tautology : 29
% 3.73/1.98 #SimpNegUnit : 10
% 3.73/1.98 #BackRed : 0
% 3.73/1.98
% 3.73/1.98 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.73/1.98 #Strategies tried : 1
% 3.73/1.98
% 3.73/1.98 Timing (in seconds)
% 3.73/1.98 ----------------------
% 3.73/1.98 Preprocessing : 0.51
% 3.73/1.98 Parsing : 0.29
% 3.73/1.98 CNF conversion : 0.03
% 3.73/1.98 Main loop : 0.42
% 3.73/1.98 Inferencing : 0.18
% 3.73/1.98 Reduction : 0.10
% 3.73/1.98 Demodulation : 0.06
% 3.73/1.98 BG Simplification : 0.02
% 3.73/1.98 Subsumption : 0.11
% 3.73/1.98 Abstraction : 0.01
% 3.73/1.98 MUC search : 0.00
% 3.73/1.98 Cooper : 0.00
% 3.73/1.98 Total : 0.97
% 3.73/1.98 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 3.73/1.98 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 3.73/1.98 Index Matching : 0.00
% 3.73/1.98 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------