TSTP Solution File: GEO225+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : GEO225+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:12:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   78 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   79 (  23   ~;  13   |;  33   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (  30   !;  11   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f107,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f105,f81]) ).

fof(f81,plain,
    distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ( point(sK1)
    & ! [X2] :
        ( line(X2)
        & ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,X2)
          | apart_point_and_line(sK0,X2) ) )
    & distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
    & point(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f64,f65]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( point(X1)
        & ! [X2] :
            ( line(X2)
            & ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
              | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) ) )
        & distinct_points(X0,X1)
        & point(X0) )
   => ( point(sK1)
      & ! [X2] :
          ( line(X2)
          & ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,X2)
            | apart_point_and_line(sK0,X2) ) )
      & distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
      & point(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( point(X1)
      & ! [X2] :
          ( line(X2)
          & ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
            | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) ) )
      & distinct_points(X0,X1)
      & point(X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ? [X1,X0] :
      ( point(X0)
      & ! [X2] :
          ( line(X2)
          & ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
            | apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ) )
      & distinct_points(X1,X0)
      & point(X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ? [X1,X0] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( line(X2)
          & ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
            | apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ) )
      & point(X1)
      & point(X0)
      & distinct_points(X1,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ~ ! [X1,X0] :
        ( ( point(X1)
          & point(X0)
          & distinct_points(X1,X0) )
       => ? [X2] :
            ( line(X2)
           => ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
              & ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X6,X5] :
        ( ( point(X6)
          & distinct_points(X5,X6)
          & point(X5) )
       => ? [X0] :
            ( line(X0)
           => ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,X0)
              & ~ apart_point_and_line(X5,X0) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f19,conjecture,
    ! [X6,X5] :
      ( ( point(X6)
        & distinct_points(X5,X6)
        & point(X5) )
     => ? [X0] :
          ( line(X0)
         => ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,X0)
            & ~ apart_point_and_line(X5,X0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolution,[],[f104,f74]) ).

fof(f74,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X0))
      | ~ distinct_points(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X1,X0)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X0)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,X1)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ci1) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(sK0,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f99,f81]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,sK1)
      | apart_point_and_line(sK0,line_connecting(X0,sK1)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f86,f82]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,X2)
      | apart_point_and_line(sK0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X1,X0))
      | ~ distinct_points(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X1,X0))
      | ~ distinct_points(X1,X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      | ~ distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,X1)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ci2) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem    : GEO225+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 21:32:18 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.50  % (1989)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (1995)ott+2_1:1_fsr=off:gsp=on:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (2013)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=439:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/439Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (2000)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.20/0.52  % (1989)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.52  % (1993)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.20/0.52  % (1989)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52  % (1989)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  % (1989)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.52  % (1989)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.52  % (1989)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  % (1989)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.20/0.52  % (1989)Time elapsed: 0.103 s
% 0.20/0.52  % (1989)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.52  % (1989)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  % (1989)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  % (1984)Success in time 0.16 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------