TSTP Solution File: GEO225+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO225+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.98s 2.23s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 3 unt; 2 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 17 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_10,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tpbkmzgb/input.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tpbkmzgb/input.p',i_0_15) ).
cnf(i_0_11,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tpbkmzgb/input.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(i_0_17,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tpbkmzgb/input.p',i_0_17) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1) ),
i_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,X1))
| ~ distinct_points(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : GEO225+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 05:13:19 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.98/2.23 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 6.98/2.23 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 6.98/2.23 # Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 6.98/2.23
% 6.98/2.23 # Proof found!
% 6.98/2.23 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.98/2.23 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.98/2.23 # Proof object total steps : 10
% 6.98/2.23 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 6.98/2.23 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 6.98/2.23 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 6.98/2.23 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 6.98/2.23 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 6.98/2.23 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 6.98/2.23 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 6.98/2.23 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 6.98/2.23 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 6.98/2.23 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.98/2.23 # Parsed axioms : 19
% 6.98/2.23 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Initial clauses : 19
% 6.98/2.23 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Initial clauses in saturation : 19
% 6.98/2.23 # Processed clauses : 20
% 6.98/2.23 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # ...subsumed : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # ...remaining for further processing : 20
% 6.98/2.23 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Generated clauses : 8
% 6.98/2.23 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 7
% 6.98/2.23 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Paramodulations : 8
% 6.98/2.23 # Factorizations : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Current number of processed clauses : 20
% 6.98/2.23 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 6.98/2.23 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 6.98/2.23 # Non-unit-clauses : 14
% 6.98/2.23 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 6.98/2.23 # ...number of literals in the above : 10
% 6.98/2.23 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6
% 6.98/2.23 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 6.98/2.23 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Condensation successes : 0
% 6.98/2.23 # Termbank termtop insertions : 443
% 6.98/2.23
% 6.98/2.23 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.98/2.23 # User time : 0.007 s
% 6.98/2.23 # System time : 0.004 s
% 6.98/2.23 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 6.98/2.23 # ...preprocessing : 0.011 s
% 6.98/2.23 # ...main loop : 0.000 s
% 6.98/2.23 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 6.98/2.23
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------