TSTP Solution File: GEO225+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO225+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:04:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 51 ( 21 ~; 13 |; 10 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 1 sgn 22 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X6,X7] :
( ( point(X6)
& point(X7)
& distinct_points(X6,X7) )
=> ? [X1] :
( line(X1)
=> ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,X1)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X7,X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',con) ).
fof(apart4,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_points(X1,X3)
| distinct_points(X2,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart4) ).
fof(ci2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).
fof(apart1,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart1) ).
fof(ci1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X6,X7] :
( ( point(X6)
& point(X7)
& distinct_points(X6,X7) )
=> ? [X1] :
( line(X1)
=> ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,X1)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X7,X1) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ distinct_points(X4,X5)
| distinct_points(X4,X6)
| distinct_points(X5,X6) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[apart4])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X10,X10] :
( point(esk1_0)
& point(esk2_0)
& distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& line(X10)
& ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X10)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X10) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ distinct_points(X3,X4)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,line_connecting(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X2] : ~ distinct_points(X2,X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X3,X2)
| ~ distinct_points(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ distinct_points(X3,X4)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X2,X1))
| ~ distinct_points(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,X1)
| distinct_points(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2))
| ~ distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(X1,esk1_0))
| ~ distinct_points(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO225+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 05:24:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.22/1.41
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 21
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 10
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 9
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 6
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.22/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.22/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Initial clauses : 23
% 0.22/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.22/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 19
% 0.22/1.41 # Processed clauses : 23
% 0.22/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.22/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 22
% 0.22/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Generated clauses : 11
% 0.22/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 10
% 0.22/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Paramodulations : 11
% 0.22/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 22
% 0.22/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.22/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.22/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.22/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 17
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.22/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12
% 0.22/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.22/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.22/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.22/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1601
% 0.22/1.41
% 0.22/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.41 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.22/1.41 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/1.41 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.22/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 2828 pages
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------