TSTP Solution File: GEO224+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : GEO224+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:12:22 EDT 2022

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 0.19s 0.48s
% Output   : FiniteModel 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : GEO224+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 21:40:17 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.46  % (18799)ott-1_1:6_av=off:cond=on:fsr=off:nwc=3.0:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.47  % (18807)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:i=59:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/59Mi)
% 0.19/0.47  TRYING [1]
% 0.19/0.48  TRYING [2]
% 0.19/0.48  Finite Model Found!
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.48  % (18807)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS output start FiniteModel for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_$i,type,$i:$tType).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_$i1,type,fmb_$i_1:$i).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_$i2,type,fmb_$i_2:$i).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(finite_domain,axiom,
% 0.19/0.49        ! [X:$i] : (
% 0.19/0.49           X = fmb_$i_1 | X = fmb_$i_2
% 0.19/0.49        ) ).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  tff(distinct_domain,axiom,
% 0.19/0.49           fmb_$i_1 != fmb_$i_2
% 0.19/0.49  ).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_bool,type,$o:$tType).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_bool1,type,fmb_bool_1:$o).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(finite_domain,axiom,
% 0.19/0.49        ! [X:$o] : (
% 0.19/0.49           X = fmb_bool_1
% 0.19/0.49        ) ).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_line_connecting,type,line_connecting: $i * $i > $i).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(function_line_connecting,axiom,
% 0.19/0.49             line_connecting(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_1) = fmb_$i_2
% 0.19/0.49           & line_connecting(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_2) = fmb_$i_1
% 0.19/0.49           & line_connecting(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_1) = fmb_$i_1
% 0.19/0.49           & line_connecting(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_2) = fmb_$i_2
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  ).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_intersection_point,type,intersection_point: $i * $i > $i).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(function_intersection_point,axiom,
% 0.19/0.49             intersection_point(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_1) = fmb_$i_1
% 0.19/0.49           & intersection_point(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_2) = fmb_$i_1
% 0.19/0.49           & intersection_point(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_1) = fmb_$i_1
% 0.19/0.49           & intersection_point(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_2) = fmb_$i_2
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  ).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_parallel_through_point,type,parallel_through_point: $i * $i > $i).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(function_parallel_through_point,axiom,
% 0.19/0.49             parallel_through_point(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_1) = fmb_$i_1
% 0.19/0.49           & parallel_through_point(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_2) = fmb_$i_1
% 0.19/0.49           & parallel_through_point(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_1) = fmb_$i_2
% 0.19/0.49           & parallel_through_point(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_2) = fmb_$i_2
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  ).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_orthogonal_through_point,type,orthogonal_through_point: $i * $i > $i).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(function_orthogonal_through_point,axiom,
% 0.19/0.49             orthogonal_through_point(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_1) = fmb_$i_2
% 0.19/0.49           & orthogonal_through_point(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_2) = fmb_$i_2
% 0.19/0.49           & orthogonal_through_point(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_1) = fmb_$i_1
% 0.19/0.49           & orthogonal_through_point(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_2) = fmb_$i_1
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  ).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_distinct_points,type,distinct_points: $i * $i > $o ).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(predicate_distinct_points,axiom,
% 0.19/0.49             ~distinct_points(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_1)
% 0.19/0.49           & ~distinct_points(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_2)
% 0.19/0.49           & ~distinct_points(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_1)
% 0.19/0.49           & ~distinct_points(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_2)
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  ).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_distinct_lines,type,distinct_lines: $i * $i > $o ).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(predicate_distinct_lines,axiom,
% 0.19/0.49             ~distinct_lines(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_1)
% 0.19/0.49           & distinct_lines(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_2)
% 0.19/0.49           & distinct_lines(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_1)
% 0.19/0.49           & ~distinct_lines(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_2)
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  ).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_convergent_lines,type,convergent_lines: $i * $i > $o ).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(predicate_convergent_lines,axiom,
% 0.19/0.49             ~convergent_lines(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_1)
% 0.19/0.49           & convergent_lines(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_2)
% 0.19/0.49           & convergent_lines(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_1)
% 0.19/0.49           & ~convergent_lines(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_2)
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  ).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_apart_point_and_line,type,apart_point_and_line: $i * $i > $o ).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(predicate_apart_point_and_line,axiom,
% 0.19/0.49             ~apart_point_and_line(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_1)
% 0.19/0.49           & ~apart_point_and_line(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_2)
% 0.19/0.49           & ~apart_point_and_line(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_1)
% 0.19/0.49           & ~apart_point_and_line(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_2)
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  ).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_unorthogonal_lines,type,unorthogonal_lines: $i * $i > $o ).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(predicate_unorthogonal_lines,axiom,
% 0.19/0.49             unorthogonal_lines(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_1)
% 0.19/0.49           & ~unorthogonal_lines(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_2)
% 0.19/0.49           & ~unorthogonal_lines(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_1)
% 0.19/0.49           & unorthogonal_lines(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_2)
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  ).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_point,type,point: $i > $o ).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(predicate_point,axiom,
% 0.19/0.49             point(fmb_$i_1)
% 0.19/0.49           & ~point(fmb_$i_2)
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  ).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_line,type,line: $i > $o ).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(predicate_line,axiom,
% 0.19/0.49             line(fmb_$i_1)
% 0.19/0.49           & line(fmb_$i_2)
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  ).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  tff(declare_apt,type,apt: $i * $i > $o ).
% 0.19/0.49  tff(predicate_apt,axiom,
% 0.19/0.49  %         apt(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_1) undefined in model
% 0.19/0.49  %         apt(fmb_$i_1,fmb_$i_2) undefined in model
% 0.19/0.49  %         apt(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_1) undefined in model
% 0.19/0.49  %         apt(fmb_$i_2,fmb_$i_2) undefined in model
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  ).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS output end FiniteModel for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.49  % (18807)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  % (18807)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.49  % (18807)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.49  % (18807)Termination reason: Satisfiable
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  % (18807)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.19/0.49  % (18807)Time elapsed: 0.079 s
% 0.19/0.49  % (18807)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.19/0.49  % (18807)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  % (18807)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  % (18789)Success in time 0.138 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------